IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, CHANDIGARH
TA 110 of 2008
Date of decision:5.8.2009
Raj Rani
Petitioner
vs
Balwinder Singh
Respondent
Present Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate
Mr. NK Manchanda, Advocvate.
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
The parties are present in person. The petitioner does not
want to stay with the respondent on account of his conduct. She is staying
at Phul. The respondent has filed an application u/s 9 of the Hindu
Marriage Act at Moga. The petitioner being a resident of Phul and not
interested to stay with the respondent on account of his conduct, has to
contest the application on merits, taking into consideration the comparative
convenience of both the parties, it is deemed appropriate to transfer the
proceedings u/s 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, initiated by the respondent at
Moga to Phul.
Accordingly, the petition is allowed, Civil Judge (Sr.D.) Moga is
directed to send the file, complete in all respects, to Civil Judge (Sr.D.)
Phul. The parties are directed to appear before the learned Civil Judge
(Sr.D), Phul on 12.9.2009 for further proceedings.
August 5 ,2009 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE