Central Information Commission Judgements

Shri Binod Kumar vs State Bank Of India, on 6 August, 2009

Central Information Commission
Shri Binod Kumar vs State Bank Of India, on 6 August, 2009
                      Central Information Commission
          Complaint No.CIC/WB/C/2008/01062-SM dated 05.03.2008
             Right to Information Act-2005-Under Section (18)



                                                     Dated:   6 August 2009


Name of the Complainant          :   Shri Binod Kumar,
                                     B-33, Gitanjali Apartment,
                                     Shastri Nagar, Patna (Bihar).


Name of the Public Authority     :   CPIO, State Bank of India,
                                     Sectt. of G.M. (Network I),
                                     Local Head Office,
                                     West Gandhi Maidan, PB No.103,
                                     Patna - 800 001.


       The Complainant was present.

       The Respondent was not present in spite of notice.

2. In this case, the Appellant had, in his application dated March 5,

2008, requested the CPIO for the copies of a number of documents relating

to the term loan account number 30004570803 of M/s Putul Diagnostic

Centre in which he was stated to be a guarantor. The CPIO wrote to him on

April 8, 2008 and denied most of the information relating to the loan

account on the ground that it was exempt under Section 8(1)(d) and (j) of

the Right to Information (RTI) Act. However, he agreed to provide a copy of

the guarantee agreement against payment of the photocopying charges. Not

satisfied with the reply, the Appellant had approached the Appellate

Authority in his appeal dated April 16, 2008. It is not clear if the Appellate

Authority decided his case. Now, he has come before the CIC in second

appeal.

CIC/WB/C/2008/01062-SM

3. The hearing in this case was conducted through videoconferencing.

The Appellant was present in the Patna studio of the NIC while the

Respondent was not present in spite of notice. After hearing his submissions

and carefully going through the reply of the CPIO, we feel that the

Appellant has a right to get at least those documents concerning this

particular term loan account in which, he, as a guarantor, has affixed his

signature. We, therefore, direct the CPIO to provide to the Appellant within

10 working days from the receipt of this order certified copies of all such

documents which form part of the above term loan account in which the

Appellant has affixed his signature as a guarantor.

4. With the above direction, the appeal is disposed off.

5. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.

(Satyananda Mishra)
Information Commissioner

Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied
against application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the
CPIO of this Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla)
Assistant Registrar

CIC/WB/C/2008/01062-SM