High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Komal Ram vs Patna Municipal Corporation … on 27 January, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Komal Ram vs Patna Municipal Corporation … on 27 January, 2011
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        CWJC No.1605 of 2011
          KOMAL RAM, SON OF BIJAY RAM, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NAND
          NAGAR, NAHARPAR, P.O. AND P.S. KADAMKUAN, DISTRICT AND
          TOWN PATNA.
                    ...                   ...   PETITIONER.
                                Versus
     1.   PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS MUNICIPAL
          COMMISSIONER, BUDH MARG, PATNA-1.
     2.   THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER-CUM-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
          PATNA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BUDH MARG, PATNA-1.
     3.   THE CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, PATNA MUNICIPAL
          CORPORATION,BUDH MARG, PATNA-1.
                    ...                   ...   RESPONDENTS.
                             -----------

2. 27.1.2011. Heard Shri Vijay Kumar Singh,

learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri

Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, learned counsel

appearing on behalf of respondent nos.1 to

3/Patna Municipal Corporation.

The petitioner, who retired with

effect from 30.6.2009 as Samprati Prabhari

Chalak, Bankipur Anchal, Patna Municipal

Corporation, has prayed for directing the

respondents to make payment of his all

retiral dues. It was submitted by learned

counsel for the petitioner that despite the

fact that petitioner retired in the month

of June,2009 and thereafter, he had filed

representation, till date retiral dues of

the petitioner has not been cleared.

With the consent of parties, the

writ petition is being disposed of with
2

liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh

representation before respondent no.2

within a period of six weeks from today. If

such representation is filed, the

respondent no.2 is required to examine the

same and pass appropriate order for

redressing all the grievances of the

petitioner including payment of retiral

dues to the petitioner within a period of

two months from the date of filing of such

representation. In case of refusal, the

respondent no.2 is directed to pass a

speaking order within aforesaid time. It is

made clear that petitioner shall also be

entitled to get admissible interest on

delayed payment.

With above observation and

direction, the petition stands disposed of.

N.H./                           ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)