High Court Karnataka High Court

M/S Lakshmivenakteshwara … vs M/S Rao Constructions on 1 July, 2009

Karnataka High Court
M/S Lakshmivenakteshwara … vs M/S Rao Constructions on 1 July, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
IN ma HIGH COURT 01:' KARNATAKA, BANGALG«R§¥ "~«. "*._

BATE!) THIS THE 13'!' BAY OF' JULY, 209$ 44   "' 

BEFORE   

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUB§isiSH'TTB. 'xiii:  

cRL.P.. N0. g§ 1_'1-~..()F zobé .     

BE'i'WEEN:-

1. M/S. LAKSHMI vEN'm'EswA%RA 'I"R;&._"ERS
ANQTRANSPORTS, TV     
No.3/33:1, av. PA:LEM.,.;'V
*§AmPATR:.v--3.1S4:::, _ 
ANANTHMU1?;;'%D._isT1%ic;'?£f, _
ANDHRA   
REP, MBY'-1,':'$ i?§€OF*Ri~ET'(§i?,  ii.
SR1' v.'1"; --S1§:N1VAsA:~L"---  "

2. SRIK?J.'I'.._ sR1NNAsAN';T~«.,, " 
AGE: 52 YEARS"; _ _ '"
3/ 0. LACTE 'mx -.KR.:si~1s~£AN1AcHAizYA,
4;";<';';n.L.:~Io.3;-.314'1, RV. PALEIVI,
 '3~*A§)_PATsa: ~--  1*;3.<.:.1_V1,
_ ""ANANTHAP'UR DIS'l'RIC'i',
 AN-Ij_)HRA 'PRADESH.
*  " = ' PETITIONERS

(3? gm :v::"_'1m;=?;Pi5A REZDDY, ADVOCATE)

L' Aflii'. . 

A --,M;=:3., RAE) CONSTRUCFEQNS,
 =1m.M_9' 2/2, BDA FLATS,
_  ;3.A1~é:<:ERGATTA ROAD,

 " BANGALORE'; ---» 560076,
.. -RE? BY ITS MANAGING PARWNER,

 SR1 (1.3. RAG.

RESPONDENT

THIS (3i7~3L.P IS FILED U/8.482 cm>.«:: BY’ i*1_*:~:E:
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITEONER PRAYING THAT”THiS.
HOWBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASED«EVV’~’§HiE_
ORDERS om I.A.N().1 DATED: 16.6.2009 PASSZEI} By’*1?HE:”–‘-T *
;«’1’c«1, BANGALORE IN CRLAP1-“‘EAL Nos,4»7:3…&;_%~47:z,{2oo€2
ONLY IN 1233930? op D¥RECTING.-THE’APEr’TIT§4O’i?I.ERS._fFO ‘
DEPOSIT 20% 01:’ THE FINE AMOUNT BY aL~L.owi’;NGV,’r_H’i$_ ~
PETITION. ” _

This petition is” c0m.iI1g for <51"rie1s._ file
Court made the following: " *

oauz;;fy
The ptetitionmt has orcier passed
by {ha learzltad ;'Se's-;§,i9ns:=__Jugd¥'§é, City in Criminal

Aypcal NQ';V473'&.: , '

2. _ Vresp§):1dt:Vnif«Ir:i7€sLdh filed private compiaint Ufs.

fer Qjfffincfivpumshable U,!s.138 of NJ. Act. It

iss ’13.ét”injAc1é$:p1§i;eifhat the petitiemtr was convifted by the trial

<:oa=r£ swim' and 81130 fine. The said judgment of

4:Qnviefi.0.ns'"az1d mtier of sentence is called in question before

'é;m:*':¢a::nsd' Scssiozw Judge in Cziminal Appeal.

Q' « apphlcatien granted the interim relief and suspendsd {km

3. The learned Sessiens Jucige consiciering the

sentemtfi subject to the petitioners executing bend

of Rs.:”S(),O{}O /- and 51130 subject to the peti:ioners;”&3e;§fo:$iiixig” A-

20% {)f the fine amount, The orde1″.;pa:~1s.ed .1éam;d

Sessions Judge impcsing I'(iE’:lSO]3£Et1I)1{.*;’«’C(25.3.§’_1fj;ifi(}I’:}’§_ is _j::._sut

propcr and it fines }f1(}t call f()I’V$1fi’L’?.f{‘ff3]l'(3AI”l(;’.(:§. siheé

petition is dismissed. However, for..pa}f1:;enf of {me
is amended by two weeks?-V ._ _ _ AA

sd/4

Judge