Gujarat High Court High Court

Appearance vs Mr Aj Desai Addl. Public … on 27 August, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Appearance vs Mr Aj Desai Addl. Public … on 27 August, 2010
Author: Z.K.Saiyed,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/9656/2010	 2/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 9656 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

RANJIT
@ BHURIYO S/O LALABHAI THAKOR & 2
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT 

 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
A M CHAUHAN for
Applicant(s) : 1 - 3. 
MR AJ DESAI ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for
Respondent 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 27/08/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

This
application is filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure by the applicants who have been arrested in connection
with C.R. No. I – 337 of 2010 registered with Odhav Police
Station, Ahmedabad for the offence punishable under sections 323,
326, 294(B), 143, 147, 148 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code and under
Section 135(1) of the Bombay Police Act.

Learned
advocate for the applicants submitted that the applicants are
innocent persons and a false case is foisted on them. He submitted
that considering the role attributed to the applicants and reflected
in the FIR at Annexure ‘A’ to the application, this is a fit case to
enlarge the applicants on regular bail.

As against
the aforesaid, learned APP submitted that considering the role played
by the applicants, no discretionary relief can be granted to the
applicants, and the application deserves to be dismissed.

Having
heard the rival submissions of learned advocates and having
considered the role attributed to the applicants and reflected in the
FIR at Annexure A, the quantum of punishment etc. and gravity of
offence, I am of the view that the applicants are required to be
enlarged on regular bail at this stage on stringent conditions,
without entering into the merits of the case and without discussing
the evidence in detail.

The
parties do not press for further reasoned order.

In the
facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and
the applicants are ordered to be enlarged on bail in connection with
C.R. No. I – 337 of 2010 registered with Odhav Police Station,
Ahmedabad, on their executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten
thousand only] each with one surety of the like amount to the
satisfaction of the trial court and subject to the conditions that
they shall:

[a] not
take undue advantage of their liberty or abuse their liberty;

[b]. not
act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

[c]. surrender
their passports, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d]. not
leave the State of Gujarat without the prior permission of the
Sessions court concerned;

[e]. furnish
the present addresses of their residence to the I.O. and also to the
Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change their
residence without prior permission of this Court;

[g]. maintain
law and order.

If breach
of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge
concerned will be free to issue warrant or to take appropriate action
in the matter.

Bail bond
to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the
case.

At the
trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of
preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this
Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.

Rule is
made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct Service is
permitted.

(Z.K.SAIYED,
J.)

(vijay)

   

Top