High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Surendra Bind & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 8 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Surendra Bind & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 8 September, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Cr. Misc. No.26607 of 2011
                   1. Surendra Bind son of Late Lakhan Bind,
                   2. Ram Pravesh Bind son of late Kailash Bind,
                   3. Deenanath Ram @ Deenanath Prasad son of Muneshar Ram &
                   4. Devendar Bind son of Bipat Bind                  ...Petitioners
                                          Versus
                  The State Of Bihar                                       ...OP
                                         -----------

2/ 08.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in a case instituted

for the offence under sections 147, 341, 323, 353 and 379 of the

Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the informant is said to have been

assaulted with fits and slaps and the petitioners have no criminal

antecedent, it is ordered that in the event of surrender of the

petitioners, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt

of a copy of this order in connection with Tekari (Panchanpur) P.S.

Case No.31 of 2011, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(five thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Gaya, subject to conditions as laid down under section

438 (2) Cr. P.C., and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailors

will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change

in the address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly

state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and, if

they are, they shall not be released on bail and further the petitioners

shall undertake to be represented on the first date after cognizance if
2

the investigation in the case is still pending and in case they fail to

do so, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled (iii) That the

bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court

concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of

similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for

cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners

will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail

to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their

bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse and (v) That

the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail

to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be

cancelled.

JA/-                                            (Anjana Prakash,J.)