A.F.R.
Court No. 21
Reserved on 11.05.2010
Delivered on 03.07.2010
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.677 of 2010
Amrit Bhushan Singh and others
Vs.
State of U.P. and others
Connected with
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.17311 of 2010
Harish Chandra Pandey
Vs.
State of U.P. and others
IN
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.4192 of 2010
Bal Govinfd Patel and others
Vs.
State of U.P. and others
In
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.15915 of 2010
Rubi Gupta
Vs.
State of U.P. and others
In
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.62549 of 2009
Sachchida Nand Pandey
Vs.
State of U.P. and others
Hon'ble V.K. Shukla, J.
In this bunch of writ petitions, petitioners have approach this court
requesting therein to admit and grant admission to petitioners in B.Ed. Course and
further writ in the nature of mandamus be issued by awarding compensation in
favour of the petitioners.
Brief background of the case is that State Government authorized Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar University, Agra to conduct Joint Entrance Examination for B.Ed.
Course, 2008-2009. Pursuant to the said authorization given by the State
Government, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra on 20.8.2008 issued
advertisement for holding of combined examination. A corrigendum was also
issued again on 13.9.2008 wherein date of joint entrance examination was fixed
for 19.10.2008. Each one of the petitioners claim that they undertook
aforementioned joint entrance test on 19.10.2008 and thereafter, result of
aforementioned examination was declared and said result was pasted on official
website of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra. Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur
University, Gorakhpur was assigned as counseling center to all the petitioners and
2
said University in its turn enabled the petitioners to complete their admission
formalities as per their rank from the list of the colleges shown by the authorities.
Each and every information of the counseling i.e. center of the counseling, date
and admission for counseling was available on the website of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
University, Agra. Petitioners appeared at Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur
University, Gorakhpur for counseling and out of 30 colleges available on the
website, Serial No. 1 to 27 were affiliated with Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur
University, Gorakhpur, while colleges of Serial No. 28 to 30 were affiliated with
Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University, Jaunpur. Petitioners deposited
requisite counseling fee of Rs. 500/- with the counseling centre whereupon
registration slip was issued in favour of each one of the petitioner. Petitioners of
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 677 of 2010, Writ Petition No. 62549 of 2009, Writ
Petition No. 17311 of 2010 and Writ Petition No. 15915 of 2010 gave choice for
Dulari Devi Degree College, Bhikhampur, District Deoria, whereas petitioners of
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 4192 of 2010 gave choice for Lal Bahadur Shastri
Smarak Post Graduate college, Anand Nagar, Mahrajganj. Petitioners were
allocated institution of their choice and they got admission by provisional allotment
of seats and petitioners were asked to report to their respective colleges by
27.4.2009 for admission, failing which provisional allotment of seat was to be
considered as cancelled. Petitioners claim that within the time frame provided for,
they approached their respective institution, joined the same and they have been
attending the college and perused the course regularlily. Petitioners while pursuing
their study, acquired knowledge that institution in question had no authority to take
admission of B.Ed. Course for the academic year 2008-2009 and in view of
absence of recognition by N.C.T.E. under N.C.T.E. Act, 1993 their pursuing of
studies in the institution in question is of no consequence. In this background
complaining that it is matter of public fraud by statutory body, as in spite of fact that
institution was not at all accorded recognition by N.C.T.E., said institutions were
shown in the list of the institution wherein admissions were to be offered through
State Sponsored Joint Entrance Examination of B.Ed. and in unrecognized
colleges, petitioners have been sent for admission and in such a situation request
had been made for justice being done by according relief as has been claimed in
the bunch of writ petitions. At this juncture with the prayer mentioned above,
present bunch of writ petitions have been filed.
In respect of stand taken by the University, qua Dulari Devi Degree College,
Bhikhampur, District Deoria, counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Deen
Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur and therein, it has been stated
3
that said institution moved an application for grant of recognition for B.Ed. Course
and submitted application form to N.C.T.E. for the year 2006. Communication
dated 30.11.2006 was received from N.C.T.E. addressed to Education Secretary,
Government of U.P. Lucknow and Department of Higher Education wherein
request was made that recommendation of the State Government may be
furnished to the Regional Committee within stipulated period. The Manager of the
institution on 25.8.2009 sent a letter mentioning therein that college has received
recognition from the N.C.T.E. for B.Ed course vide communication dated 16.8.2007
and the college has issued advertisement for appointment of Lecturer and Head of
the Department and University may nominate subject expert to facilitate
appointment of Head of the Department and teachers in the subject. By another
communication dated 25.8.2007 Manager of the institution requested that since it
has got recognition from N.C.T.E. for conducting B.Ed. Course for 100 intake vide
communication dated 16.8.2007 as such an inspection team be constituted for
making on the spot inspection of the institution for grant of affiliation. On 6.9.2007
the Manager of the institution requested the Vice Chancellor of the University to
nominate the subject expert for B.Ed course as the advertisement of teachers had
already been published. The University, on 15.9.2007 nominated the subject
expert for B.Ed. Course. The Registrar of the University on 28.9.2007 asked the
Inspection team constituted by the Vice Chancellor of the University to submit
report after inspection of the institution. On 28.9.2007 the Registrar of the
University also informed the Manager that appointment of teachers have been
approved. State Government accorded temporary affiliation under Section 37(2) of
the Act for a period of one year w.e.f. 1.7.2007. The manager of the institution on
24.12.2007 informed the Registrar that teachers have been appointed in B.Ed.
Department according to the norms and the appointment of the Head of the
Department would be finalized within a period of one month and it was requested
that the permission to run classes be given. University vide communication dated
24.12.2007 gave permission to the institution to run classes in the B.Ed. Course
by taking admission of the students from the Joint entrance examination conducted
in the State of U.P. It was categorically stated that the conditions as mentioned in
the communication dated 20.12.2007 sent by the State Government is to be
fulfilled by the institution, otherwise the affiliation of the college would be revoked.
Later of the appointment of the Head of the Department was approved by the Vice
Chancellor of the University in pursuance to the recommendation of the Selection
Committee dated 6.3.2008. Manager of the institution on 23.7.2008 requested for
constitution of the inspection team for grant of permanent affiliation in B.Ed.
4
Course. Inspection team was constituted by the Vice Chancellor in accordance
with the Government Orders dated 27.10.2002 and 21.10.2005. Thereafter,
Registrar of the University vide communication dated 11.8.2008 directed the
member of the inspection team to give report after on the spot inspection of the
institution. Thereafter, permanent affiliation was accorded by the State Government
vide order dated 8.12.2008. Subsequent to the same it was informed that
information regarding recognition is not being shown on the Internet and in such a
situation it was resolved to get information regarding recognition through special
messenger from the Northern Regional Office of N.C.T.E., Jaipur. While said
exercised was on going, Manager of the college produced photo copy of the
letter dated 9.11.2009 in the office of the University on 25.11.2009. Said letter was
sent to the counsel for the University, and the same was filed alongwith short
counter affidavit on 26.11.2009. The genuinty of the said document was inquired
through counsel for the N.C.T.E. who after obtaining, inspection informed that
document dated 9.11.2009 is a forged documents. Thereafter, manager was asked
to show cause qua his conduct. Not only this Manager filed affidavit on 18.1.2010
wherein he has reiterated that the college had been accorded recognition from
N.C.T.E. for conducting B.Ed. Course from the academic Session 2007-2008 vide
letter dated 16.8.2007 and as such the admission taken by the college for the
academic session 2007-2008 is completely legal. Thereafter, details have been
given qua the action taken by the University against the Management of the
University.
In respect of Lal Bahadur Shastri Smarak (P.G.) College, Anand Nagar,
Mahrajganj, University has taken stand, that the Manager of the institution,
addressed letter dated 14.6.2007 to the Registrar informing that NCTE has
accorded recognition on 11.6.2007 to the institution for starting B.Ed. course after
required formalities for the purpose, as such inspection panel be constituted.
Pursuant thereto inspection panel was constituted vide letter dated 27.6.2007; said
panel gave report, recommending for temporary affiliation. Appointment of teachers
was approved on 28.8.2007.Temporary affiliation was granted by State
Government on 19.11. 2007.Further request was made on 14.5.2008, by the
Manager, that inspection panel may be constituted for grant of permanent
affiliation; as period of affiliation would expire on 30.6.2008. Accordingly inspection
panel was constituted vide letter dated 28.7.2008. Inspection was carried out,
report was submitted. The Manager, alongwith inspection report, filed notary
affidavit, that college had been accorded recognition from NCTE w.e.f. 2007-2008
academic session, and all formalities for permanent affiliation stands fulfilled. Said
5
papers were forwarded to the State Government, and permanent affiliation was
accorded on 30.12.2008, w.e.f. 1.7.2008, in exercise of authority vested under
Section 37(2) of U.P. State Universities Act, 1973. The Registrar of the University
on 28.2.2009 granted permission to conduct classes for B.Ed. Course subject to
condition mentioned in letter dated 30.12.2008.On 22.7.2009, communication was
received wherein it was mentioned that institution was issued letter of intent prior to
recognition on 11.6.2007, and as reply had not been submitted qua fulfillment of
terms and conditions, in term of Section 14(1) order of refusal was passed.
Against the same appeal has been filed, in term of Section 18 of NCTE Act, same
has been allowed on 11.9.2009 and matter has been remanded back for
examination of staff profile and for passing of appropriate orders. Details have
been given of issuance of show cause notice, and the reply submitted, and the
reiteration of the fact that NCTE had accorded recognition on 11.6.2007 , and there
is no illegality in taking of admission. Pursuant to remand order dated 11.9.2009,
again refusal order was passed refusing recognition, and against the same Appeal
had again been filed. Thereafter, details have been furnished that affiliation has
been obtained by concealment of material facts. Thereafter, reference of allowing
of Appeal has been given, with direction to NCTE to issue formal recognition order,
in continuation of conditional recognition order.
Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University,
Agra wherein it has been mentioned that common entrance test for B.Ed. Session
2008-2009 was conducted by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, Agra. All the
Universities of the State of U.P. submitted the list of their affiliated colleges to Dr.
Bhim Rao Ambedkar University, Agra, as such all those colleges were included in
B.Ed. Counseling for the academic session 2008-2009, whose name was find
place in the list of the University. Annexure CA-I and CA-II have been appended to
show and substantiate that institution in question wherein petitioners had been
accorded admission was forwarded by the University.
Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the institution also and therein
details have been given and the way and manner in which permanent affiliation
have been accorded. Further it has been stated that recognition is there, as order
dated 16.8.2007 has been passed in term of Regulation 7(11) of the N.C.T.E. Act
and further N.C.T.E. treated the colleges as recognised college, as was reflected
from the relevant extract of the list of the recognised college, as on 20.10.2007 and
in such a situation it has been sought to be stated that there is no deliberate act on
the part of the college. It has been stated that recognition for academic session
2009-2010 has been accorded and request has already been made to grant
6
recognition for academic session 2008-2009.
N.C.T.E. has also filed counter affidavit clearly stating therein that
recognition had never been accorded and it was merely letter of intent and nothing
beyond the same further retrospective recognition cannot be accorded.
Management of Dulari Devi Degree College, Deoria filed affidavit, to show
and substantiate that entire action had been bonafidely undertaken, and there has
been no fraud or mis representation on the part of Management concerned.
Manager has also filed affidavit in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 4192 of 2010
and therein it has been stated that appeal was filed against the said order and said
appeal had been allowed and order dated 11.12.2009 has been reversed and
orders have been passed to issue formal recognition order in continuation of the
conditional recognition order. As far as institution of Lal Bahadur Shastri Smarak
Post Graduate College, Anand Nagar, Mahrajganj is concerned it has to be
accepted recognised institution and in view of this request examination can be
conducted by the University of the students.
Apart from the aforementioned pleadings, pleadings in the shape of
supplementary affidavit, supplementary counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit
are also available on record alongwith other affidavits and thereafter with the
consent of the parties, present writ petition is being heard and finally decided.
Sri Ashok Khare, Senior Advocate appearing with Sri Sidharth Khare,
Advocate contended with vehemence that in the present case students are not at
all at fault and as such adequate compensation be awarded to each one of the
student and further each one of the student is not at all back door entry, rather they
are victim of fraud and manipulation made by the college in collusion with State
and University authorities as without verifying this fact as to whether said institution
had been accorded recognition by N.T.C.E. as is provided under N.C.T.E. Act,
1993 and Regulations framed thereunder or not, said institutions were shown in the
list of recognised affiliated institution and petitioners were accorded admission and
as such requisite orders be passed to the save career of the petitioners by
according admission in some other recognised institution or by passing any
other suitable order. In respect of Lal Bahadur Shastri Smarak (P.G.) College, it
has been additionally canvassed that it can be treated as recognised institution.
Arguments to the similar effect have been advanced by Sri J.J. Muneer, Advocate,
Sri V.R. Tiwari, Advocate and Sri S.K. Dwivedi, Advocate.
Countering the said submission, Sri G.K. Singh, Advocate appearing in Civil
Misc. Writ Petition No.17311 of 2010, Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 677 of 2010,
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.4192 of 2010, Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.15915 of 2010
7
and Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.62549 of 2009 on the other hand contended that
as far as institution in question is concerned, there is no fraud and manipulation on
the part of the institution and under bonafide believe admissions have been
accorded and all positive efforts have been taken by them, as such requisite relief
be refused in the present case.
Sri. Suresh Chandra Dwivedi, Advocate appearing for Management in Civil
Misc. Writ Petition No. 4192 of 2010 on the other hand contended that once appeal
has been allowed, institution has to be treated as recognised institution and as
such there is no legal impediment to get examination held of the students of his
institution in particulars.
Smt. Sunita Agarwal, Advocate on the other hand contended that in the
present case inquiry has revealed that there is no formal recognition by the
N.C.T.E. as per provision of N.C.T.E. Act, 1993 and the relevant regulations
framed thereunder, in such a situation unrecognized institution could not have
accorded admission and in fact University has been mislead by the Management
and as such action is being taken against the erring management in accordance
with law.
Sri. R.A. Akhtar, Advocate appearing on behalf of the N.C.T.,E. on the other
hand contended that fact of the case clearly demonstrate that petitioners have
been accorded admission in totally unrecognized institution as per parameter of
N.C.T.E. Act, 1993 and regulations framed thereunder and qua un-recognised
institution, no directives can be issued.
Standing Counsel has contended that State is not at all at fault and on the
papers transmitted by University, action has been taken.
Shri Sanjai Singh, Advocate contended that University proceeded on the
information furnished by Deen Dayal Upadhaya University, Gorakhpur and except
for holding exams has no role to play.
After respective arguments have been advanced, undisputed factual
position, on which there is no dispute that each one of the petitioner appeared in
joint entrance test of B.Ed. course for academic session 2008-2009 conducted by
Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University, Agra, which was duly authorized by the State
Government to hold and conduct such examination. Each one of the respective
University had sent list of the affiliated recognised institution to Dr. Bhim Rao
Ambedkar University, Agra, qua which written test were to be conducted and Deen
Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhjpur University, Gorakhpur also sent list through Prof. S.N.
Tripathi, who was in-charge of B.Ed. entrance test examination on behalf of Deen
Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhjpur University, Gorakhpur. List of 47 colleges was sent by
8
the Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhjpur University, Gorakhpur and therein names of
both the institutions were shown at serial No. 7 and 18 for including in B.Ed.
Course for academic session 2008-2009. Petitioners qualified in written test and
Deen Dayal Upadhyay Gorakhjpur University, Gorakhpur was assigned as
counseling centre and the list of the institution which was available for taking
admission at the time of counseling, two institutions which are subject matter of
dispute being also shown and petitioners as per merit status accepted the said
institution and thereafter, have been accorded admission and have been pursuing
their studies. Later on it has been revealed that said institutions are not at all
recognised under N.C.T.E. Act. N.C.T.E. Act, 1993, as no formal order of
recognition has been issued. With a view to achieve planned and co-ordinated
development of the teacher education system in the whole of the country and for
regularization and proper maintenance and the norms and standards in the
teacher education system. N.C.T.E. Act, 1993 came into force on 1.7.1995 and
Chapter-IV of aforementioned Act deals with recognition of the institution offering
course or training in teacher education. Relevant regulations are being extracted
below:-
14. Recognition of institutions offering course or
training in teacher education. (1) Every institution offering
or intending to offer a course or training in teacher education
on or after the appointed day, may, for grant of recognition
under this Act, make an application to the Regional
Committee concerned in such form and in such manner as
may be determined by regulations:
Provided that an institution offering a course or
training in teacher education immediately before the
appointed day, shall be entitled to continue such course or
training for a period of six months, if it has made an
application for recognition within the said period and until the
disposal of the application by the Regional Committee.
(2) The fee to be paid along with the application under
sub- section (1) shall be such as may be prescribed.
(3) On receipt of an application by the Regional
Committee from any institution under sub-section (1), and
after obtaining from the institution concerned such other
particulars as it may consider necessary, it shall,-
(a) if it is satisfied that such institution has adequate
financial resources, accommodation, library, qualified staff,
laboratory and that it fulfils such other conditions required for
proper functioning of the institution for a course or training in
teacher education, as may be determined by regulations,
pass an order granting recognition to such institution,
subject to such conditions as may be determined by
regulations; or
(b) if it is of the opinion that such institution does not
9fulfil the requirements laid down in sub-clause (a), pass an
order refusing recognition to such institution for reasons to
be recorded in writing: Provided that before passing an order
under sub-clause (b), the Regional Committee shall provide
a reasonable opportunity to the concerned institution for
making a written representation.
(4) Every order granting or refusing recognition to an
institution for a course or training in teacher education under
sub- section (3) shall be published in the Official Gazette
and communicated in writing for appropriate action to such
institution and to the concerned examining body, the local
authority or the State Government and the Central
Government.
(5) Every institution, in respect of which recognition
has been refused shall discontinue the course or training in
teacher education from the end of the academic session
next following the date of receipt of the order refusing
recognition passed under clause (b) of
sub-section (3).
(6) Every examining body shall, on receipt of the
order under sub-section (4),–
(a) grant affiliation, to the institution, where
recognition has been granted; or’ (b) cancel the
affiliation of the institution, where recognition has been
refused.
15.Permission for a new course or training by
recognised institution. (1) Where any recognised
institution intends to start any new course or training in
teacher education, it may make an application to seek
permission there for to the Regional Committee concerned
in such form and in such manner as may be determined by
regulations.
(2) The fees to be paid along with the application
under sub- section (1)shall be such as may be prescribed.
(3) On receipt of an application from an institution
under sub- section (1), and after obtaining from the
recognised institution such other particulars as may be
considered necessary, the Regional Committee shall,–
(a) if it is satisfied that such recognised institution has
adequate financial resources, accommodation, library,
qualified staff, laboratory, and that it fulfils such other
conditions required for proper conduct of the new course or
training in teacher education, as may be determined by
regulations, pass an order granting permission, subject to
such conditions as may be determined by regulation; or
(b) if it is of the opinion that such institution does not
fulfil the requirements laid down in sub-clause (a), pass an
order refusing permission to such institution, for reasons to
be recorded in writing:
Provided that before passing an order refusing
10permission under sub-clause (b), the Regional Committee
shall provide a reasonable opportunity to the institution
concerned for making a written representation.
(4) Every order granting or refusing permission to a
recognised institution for a new course or training in teacher
education under sub-section (3), shall be published in the
Official Gazette and communicated in writing for appropriate
action to such recognised institution and to the concerned
examining body, the local authority, the State Government
and the Central Government.
16. Affiliating body to grant affiliation after
recognition or permission by the Council.
Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the
time being in force, no examining body shall, on or after the
appointed day,-
(a) grant affiliation, whether provisional or otherwise,
to any institution; or
(b) hold examination, whether provisional or
otherwise, for a course or training conducted by a
recognised institution, unless the institution concerned has
obtained recognition from the Regional Committee
concerned, under section 14 or permission for a course or
training under section 15.
In exercise of authority vested under Section 32(2) of the Act, 1993
regulations have been framed known as (National Council for Teacher Education
(Recognition Norms & Procedure) Regulations, 2007. Relevant para 7,8 ,9 and 11
are being extracted below.
Regulation 7 – Processing of Application.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
7.The Regional Committee shall decide grant of
recognition or permission to an institution only after
satisfying itself that the institution fulfills all the conditions
prescribed by the N.C.T.E. under the NCTE Act, Rules or
Regulations, including inter-alia, the norms and standards
laid down for the relevant teacher education
programme/course.
(8) In the matter of grant of recognition, the Regional
Committees shall strictly act within the ambit of the National
Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993, the National
Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 as amended
11
from time to time and the regulations make under the NCTE
Act, 1993 including the norms and standards for various
teacher education programmes and shall not make any
relaxation thereto. The Regional Director who is the
convener of the Regional Committee, while putting up the
proposal to the Regional Committee, shall ensure that the
correct provisions in the NCTE Act, Rules and Regulations
including Norms and Standards for various teacher
Education programmes are brought to the notice of the
Regional Committee to enable the Regional Committee to
take appropriate decisions.
(9) The institution concerned shall be informed,
through a letter, of the decision for grant of recognition or
permission subject to appointment of qualified faculty
members before the commencement of the academic
session. The letter issued under this clause shall not be
notified in the Gazette. The faculty shall be appointed on the
recommendations of the Selection Committee duly
constituted as per the policy of the State
Government/Central Government/University/UGC or the
concerned affiliating body, as the case may be. The
applicant institution shall submit an affidavit in the
prescribed form that the Selection Committee has been
constituted as stated above. A separate staff list with the
details would be submitted in the Prescribed form. The
Regional Committee would rely on the above affidavit and
the staff list before processing the case for grant of formal
recognition.
(11) The institution concerned, after appointing the
requisite faculty staff as per Regulation 7(9) above and
fulfilling the conditions under Regulation 7(10) above shall
formally inform the Regional Committee concerned
alongwith the requisite affidavit and staff list. The Regional
Committee concerned shall then issue a formal recognition
order that shall be notified as per provisions of the NCTE
Act.”
Regulation 8- Conditions for grant of recognition (12). An institution
shall make admission only after it obtains order of recognition from the Regional
Committee concerned under Regulation 7(11), and affiliation from the examining
body.
On the parameter as provided under statutory provision holding the field of
according recognition, as far as recognition by the NCTE is concerned, at no point
of time, any formal letter of recognition under Clause 7(11) of the Act had ever
been issued in favour of the institution in question namely Dulari Devi Degree
College, Bindwaliya, Bhikhmpur, Deoria. Letter, which has been made foundation
and basis for according admission and for presuming that it is a letter of
recognition is in fact only letter intent prior to recognition as per Clause 7(9) and at
12
no point of time, any formal recognition order under Clause 7(11) had ever been
issued. Letter dated 16.8.2007, of NCTE shows Dulari Devi Degree College,
Bindwaliya Bhikampur, District Deoria at Serial No. 64, and item No. 3 clearly
proceeds to mention that it is letter prior to recognition, and also clearly proceeds
to pass prohibitory order, the institution shall not admit the students to the course,
until it submits the compliance regarding the appointment of qualified teaching
staff and until the unconditional recognition order under 7(12) of Regulation is
issued to the institution. Before this Court, it has been submitted by the University,
that Manager had made manipulations in the said letter by deleting the said
conditions, whereas the original letter contained such condition. Enquiry against
the Management is already on, and such this Court is not expressing any opinion,
but the fact of the matter is that in term of Clause 7(11) of Regulation, no formal
order of recognition had ever been issued, then the institution in question by no
stretch of imagination could be accepted to be recognized institution and could
have proceeded to admit the students.
In respect of Lal Bahadur Shastri Smarak Post Graduate College, Anand
Nagar, Mahrajganj, it has been sought to be contended that on account of allowing
of appeal, institution in question has to be accepted as recognised institution.
Appeal in question have been preferred against the decision dated 11/12.12.2009
refusing recognition for conducting B.Ed. Course, said appeal has been allowed
and therein directions have been issued to issue formal recognition order in
continuance of conditional recognition order within 15 days from the date of issue
recognition order. Here also till date formal recognition in term of Clause 7(11) of
the Regulation had never been issued and earlier recognition, which was
accorded, it was merely letter of intent as is clearly reflected from condition No.3,
wherein it is clearly mentioned, it is letter of intent prior to recognition, and also
further imposed prohibitory condition, that institution shall not admit to the course,
until it submits the compliance regarding the appointment of qualified teachers and
until unconditional recognition order is issued. Without there being any
unconditional recognition order, in the teeth of prohibition imposed on 11.6.2007
and as such in between two institution, which are subject matter of issue in the
present writ petition in pith and substance, there is no difference, as in both the
cases, formal order of recognition had never been issued, at the point of time,
when the admission had been accorded, and in breach of the prohibition imposed,
admission to students have been accorded.
Once this is factual scenario, then net effect of the same is that both the
institutions in question as per parameter of N.C.T.E. Act and relevant regulations
13
have to be treated as unrecognized institution for the academic session 2008-
2009, when petitioners have been accorded admission, and according of
recognition for session 2009-2010 and allowing of appeal will not change the
situation.
Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of CBSEVS Sunil Kumr AIR 1988 2235
has taken view that permitting students to unaffiliated institution to appear in the
examination tantamount to sub version of law and this Court will not be justified
to misplaced sympathy in favour of students. Said principle has been followed by
Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sunil Oraon Vs. CBSE 2006 (13) SCC, 673 by
mentioning that ultimate victim are students who are innocent , but same cannot
be ground for granting relief to them. Hon’ble Apex Court following the same
principles in the case of Director (Studies) Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Hotel
Management Vs. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, 2009(1) SCC 59, took the view in
such matters, passing of interim orders cannot be approved of. Once petitioners
have been accorded admission in un-recognized institution, then in such a situation
qua the said two institution, Dulari Devi Degree College, Bhikampur, Deoria being
accorded recognition for academic Session 2009-2010, and appeal of Lal Bahadur
Shastri Smarak (PG) College, Mahrajganj being allowed, no relief can be accorded
to the petitioners to permit them to undertake examination from the said two
institutions for academic session 2008-2009.
Section 16 of NCTE Act opens with on-obstante clause and requires
affiliating body to grant affiliation only after recognition or permission by the
Council. In the present case, without there being any formal order of recognition
been passed, University recommended for grant of affiliation to the State
Government under Section 37(2) of U.P. State Universities Act 1973 and in
mechanical manner, without verifying the factum of recognition, State Government
in mechanical manner accorded affiliation. Obtaining of recognition by the Council
was condition precedent before granting affiliation under Section 37(2) of U.P.
state Universities Act, 1973.
However, in the facts of the present case, as petitioners have not
manipulated anything and to the contrary record in question clearly reflects that
under State Sponsored Test conducted by Dr. Bhim Rao Ambedkar University,
Agra, petitioners appeared and thereafter were declared successful, and in the list
of the college, which was admittedly supplied by the University for counseling
they were accorded admission in the said respective institution. Here petitioners
before this court are at not at all fault and they have been accorded admission in
un-recognised institution of the NCTE for academic session 2008-2009, on account
14
of there being gross negligence on the part of the University-authority/ State in not
being vigilant words to their obligation, the institution in question succeeded in
getting its name included in the list of recognised institution and thus perpetuated
fraud on the students.
Fact of the matter is that petitioners are not at all fault and in this situation
and in this background, as it has been found that both the institutions are un-
recognized for the academic year 2008-2009, in such a situation this court directs
management of both the institutions to return entire fees to the petitioners
alongwith 9% simple interest within next one month from the date of production of
certified copy of this order.
Compensation is also being accorded for the wrong which has been done
on account of gross negligence on the part of the State Authority including
University and on account of misrepresentation on the part of the institution
concerned. One academic year of the students cannot be returned back.
Compensation can always be awarded when there is infringement of States
obligation, in proceedings under Article 226, by-passing the old doctrine of
relegating aggrieved to the remedies available in civil law suits, and current
judicial trend is to provide expeditious relief to an individual . Court of law cannot
close its consciousness and aliveness to stark realties, by adopting justice oriented
approach. In the facts of present case driving the students to civil court to contest
litigation, when they are in such stage of career will not at all be appropriate, when
either they should be in classroom or preparing themselves to settle them selves.
In this background in order to bring their agony to an end, as State
Government/University, Deen Dayal Upadhaya, University Gorakhpur and
respective institution all have contributed to such situation, compensation of Rs
One lac is awarded to each student. Out of this one lac rupees fifty thousand
each shall be paid to the student by the Management of the institution within two
months from the date of judgment. Remaining fifty thousand amount shall be paid
by State Government/ University in equal proportion, to the students concern within
the same period as mentioned above. State Government/University, would be
entitled to recover the said amount, from its erring official/employees after making
due enquiry into the matter and after fixing due responsibility in accordance with
law.
Petitioners at last contended that in the next academic session, as they are
not at all at fault, in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court, in the case of
Dally Chandra Vs. Chairman JEE 2004 AIR SCW 5699, directives be issued for
giving admission. At this juncture, the view point of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case
15
of Dally Chandra Vs. Chairman JEE 2004 AIR SCW 5699, is being looked into.
Relevant para no. 10 and 11 are being extracted below.
10. The appellant had qualified in the JEE-2003 but the said
academic year is already over. But for this situation the fault lies
with the respondents, who adopted a highly technical and rigid
attitude and not with the appellant. We are, therefore, of the
opinion that the appellant should be given admission in MBBS
course in any of the State medical colleges in the current
academic year.
11. The appeal is accordingly allowed with costs. The judgment
and order dated 31-10-2003 of the High Court is set aside. The
respondents are directed to give admission to the appellant in
any one of the State medical colleges forthwith. In case the
State seats have already been filled up, one extra seat shall be
created for her.
On the parameters as set out as petitioners had undertaken entrance test
and admittedly have been accorded admission. Had State/University-authority
been vigilant, such situation would never have occurred and petitioners would not
have been put in such great dis-advantageous situation in such a situation and in
this background, it is hereby directed that as academic session 2009-2010 has
been declared to be zero session, in such a situation and in this background it is
hereby directed that for academic session 2010-2011 State Government shall
make arrangement of admission of these students in any affiliated college of
Deen Dayal Upadhaya University, Gorakhpur without asking them to undertake
any regular process of examination etc on the basis of their merit status in the
earlier examination, preferably within period of next two months from the date of
production of certified copy of this order. For this purpose State Government shall
call for the list of private affiliated college, affiliated to Deen Dayal Upadhaya
University, Gorakhpur, wherein B.Ed. course, approved by NCTE is imparted and
in the said institution, students be distributed in equal proportion as per their merit
status and choice.
With these observations, writ petitions are allowed.
Dt. 03.07.2010
T.S.