High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Prakash Chauhan vs The State Of Bihar on 12 October, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Prakash Chauhan vs The State Of Bihar on 12 October, 2010
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.30362 of 2010
                       PRAKASH CHUAHAN, SON LATE RAMCHARITRA
                       CHAUHAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KAMRUP, P.S.
                       KADWA, DISTRICT KATIHAR.
                                             Versus
                                  THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                          -----------

02. 12.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

Petitioner husband is apprehending his

arrest in connection with a case registered for the

offence under Section-498A of the Penal Code and

Section-4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted

on behalf of the petitioner that he is ready and willing to

continue the matrimonial relationship with the

complainant and to that effect he shall file written

undertaking on affidavit in the court below within four

weeks from the date of receipt of this order in the court

below.

No sooner the petitioner above named file

such undertaking on affidavit, he be admitted to the

privilege of provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of

Rs.5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional

Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with

Complaint Case No.1897 of 2008, thereafter notice be

issued to the complainant and once she appears
2

petitioner in presence of the court should persuade her

to come back to the matrimonial home not only by

words of mouth but also with suitable conduct and

gesture which should generate confidence in her.

In the event, complainant comes back to the

matrimonial home or the matrimonial dispute is

resolved or the complainant is found to be

unreasonable, provisional bail allowed to the petitioner

should be confirmed, failing which the court below

should pass appropriate order in accordance with law

considering the reasonableness of the stand of the

parties.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of.

Let this order be communicated to the court

below through fax on payment of usual charges by the

petitioner.

Rajesh/                                        ( V. N. Sinha, J.)