High Court Kerala High Court

Abdul Majeed vs M/S.Kasaragod Self Employees … on 3 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
Abdul Majeed vs M/S.Kasaragod Self Employees … on 3 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2485 of 2007()


1. ABDUL MAJEED, AGED 35 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. M/S.KASARAGOD SELF EMPLOYEES FINANCING
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE STATE OF KERALA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.MADHU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :03/08/2007

 O R D E R
                                R.BASANT, J
                        ------------------------------------
                       Crl.M.C.No.2485 of 2007
                        -------------------------------------
                Dated this the 3rd day of August, 2007

                                  O R D E R

The petitioner has been found guilty, convicted and sentenced in

a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

This Court sitting in revision upheld the verdict of guilty and conviction

but modified the sentence imposed. The petitioner now faces a

substantive sentence of imprisonment till rising of court. He was

further directed under Section 357(3) Cr.P.C `to pay’ an amount of

Rs.1,45,000/- as compensation and in default to undergo S.I for a

period of two months.

2. According to the petitioner, the entire amount due to the

complainant has already been paid and discharged. The complainant

is willing to report that fact to the learned Magistrate. But the

petitioner apprehends that in as much as there are certain further

observations in the order passed in revision which might suggest that

the compensation amount has to be deposited before court, the

learned Magistrate may send him to prison in execution of the default

sentence when he surrenders.

3. I am satisfied that a clarification deserves to be issued. In

the operative portion in para.7 of the revisional order, the specific

Crl.M.C.No.2485 of 2007 2

direction was only `to pay’ an amount of Rs.1,45,000/-. If such

payment has been made, the petitioner along with the complainant

can report the fact to the learned Magistrate and thereupon the

learned Magistrate should not execute the default sentence.

4. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, allowed. Direction

is issued to the learned Magistrate that if the learned Magistrate is

satisfied on the submission of the complainant that the compensation

amount of Rs.1,45,000/- has been paid by the accused to the

complainant, the learned Magistrate should not proceed to execute

the default sentence notwithstanding the fact that such amount has

not been deposited but has only been paid.

5. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel for

the petitioner today itself.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
rtr/-

Crl.M.C.No.2485 of 2007 3