Madaiah Shetty vs Karnataka Slum Clearance Board on 22 February, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA. BANGALOR"E 

DATED THIS THE 22%") DAY OF FEBRUARY 29. .

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RA.M"'}v1oH_AN   

WRIT PETITION NO. 2976-2980 »A:OR"2Di0 { L13éRES1 " 

BETWEEN :

1

cp'

MADAIAH SHETTY _ 

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 

S/O. SUBBARAO "  
MULAKAETEVVILLAQE'  V

KASABA 1~1C»BL..1 _'   
NAGAB/£AE$IG!';L2\ TALU=K'"  _ 
MADYA"Dfli'ST}~--.. " ' " ..   .

   "  
AGED A}3OUT 48 YEARS .

S /D. GOVINDAPPA ---- '
1~1.ND,49. SUE§1A'SH~NAGAR
NAGAM_A1'~E,GA£A 
MANDYA DEEIT.' " 

- '1, f>Ui..fiFA'vE-SwAAV&A1'A}i
V .. AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

" D_"S,/v0,CHA.1.'£gvE GOWDA

~.  -_SC"B (_}S__E~;NAGAR
'  NAQAMANGALA TALUK
DYA DESTRECT.

A , _ BASAJAN

'AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

V'  S/0. MOHAMMED KASEM

SC BOSE NAGAR
NAGAMANALA TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT. yé




'3
5 MAQBOOL

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
S/O. MADARSAB
#4153/193. SC BOSE NAOAR
NAGAMANGALA TALUK

4 MANDYA DIST. 
 PETITIONERS  

{BY SR1 IVE. VINAYA KEERTY. ADV.)

1 KARNATAKA SLUM CLEARANCE BOARD_ -I'
REPRESENTED BY ITS CRAIRIvIAN:_'" ~ 'I 
BANGALORE.  _  

2 DY. COMMISSIONER
MANDYA DISTRICT
MMIDYA. ,  

3 THE TAHSILDAR I I 

  I' 
M£INDYA"E)'ISTF{IC'1'.,  _ .

4  .
NAGAIVIARCIALA 'TAI.II'I~: PANCHAYAT
MANDYA DISTRICT. 
   ...RESPONDEN'I'S

I {S3 SRIR,4:'DEVDAS. AGA)

 WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226

 AI\ID 22701? THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
_  '---DIRECT TT-IE RESPONDENTS TO ALI.OT THE NEWLY

CONSTRUCTED HOUSES EN SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE
_ S.NAGAR’, NAGAMANGALA TQ. MANDYA DIST. ACCORDING
THE HAKKU PATRAS ISSUED BY THE R4 IN FAVOUR
THE. RETITIONERS AS PER ANEX–D. E. F, G. 8: 1-1.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWIIQIG :

M
,;”‘*~

before the Competent. Civil Court than come rushing to

this Court invoking Article 226 of Constitution of .4
Petitions are accordingly rejected.

ENS/Srt