High Court Kerala High Court

P.A.Anand vs State Of Kerala on 19 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
P.A.Anand vs State Of Kerala on 19 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36079 of 2008(T)


1. P.A.ANAND, S/O.P.R.ACHUTHAN, 53 YEARS
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE HOME
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE

3. DEPARTMENTAL PROMOTION COMMITTEE(HIGHER)

4. YESODHARAN, DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.V.GEORGE

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.SASIKUMAR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :19/03/2009

 O R D E R
                            T.R. Ramachandran Nair, J.
                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                             W.P.(C). No.36079/2008-T
                         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                      Dated this the 19th day of March, 2009

                               J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is working as Deputy Superintendent of Police

(Motor Transport) in the office of the Inspector General of Police, Central Zone,

Ernakulam. The main relief sought for in the writ petition is to quash seniority

list Ext.P4 and other consequential reliefs. One of the prayers is to include the

petitioner in the next meeting of the DPC for the year 2008 (for the vacancy in

2009) and consider his claim for selection to the post of Superintendent of

Police (M.T.Technical).

2. The learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent points out

that in the light of the directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C).No.5062/2009

filed by the petitioner herein, this writ petition has become infructuous.

3. In the said writ petition (W.P.(C).No.5062/2009) the petitioner has

sought for a direction to the first respondent to consider Ext.P9 representation

before approving Ext.P8 select list. This Court by judgment dated 16/02/2009,

directed the first respondent to consider Ext.P9 on merits before the select list is

approved by the Government. In that view of the matter no further orders are

called for in this writ petition, it is dismissed as infructuous.

(T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)

ms