Karnataka High Court
Smt Rajeshwari vs State Of Karnataka on 11 September, 2009
-3 IN TKE 3133 CGURT OF KAREAQAKA, EARGALORE DATED mus ms 31'" DAY 0? sEp1*%aR, 2005:"- "'~«."'« vamsmmw THE BON'BLE MRS. 3032102 MARJULA cHhLL$§. =' .« . THE HON'BLE Mfi. JUSTICE A m,vEfiU$6pALA Gaaaa E
wnxw pswxwxon Ho.6$72¢e9 (a¢; ”
BETWEEK
Smx. RajeshwaxL’*,’
W70 M. C. Basavarajaiah,’.
C/o Eshwaraiah M ¢”v_ «_5_”,__
2″‘r1oor, 2minsig,5″‘crasag””
@evindanagHrajT “}f-‘7.F. “*m~
Bangalore. _’%;.W’«.–_’aV _~ ‘… PETITXONER
(By Smt. Sfiyeda’S§§fiafiéz;”Aflvocate)
AND
: i;_St$£é;¢f Kaxnfiféka}
.gepaxtment,of”Hme,
Vidhana_Safidha,”
Baxzga.-.1_._¢re:~.
‘ ‘2, Stati9n.fiéfise Qfficer,
fumkux fiawn Police Station,
‘*5Q*$amggx -N’ … RESPOREERTS
«”(fifi’Sr§; R.Shridhar Hiremath, Afih for Responéant}
-it-k*
The W.?(B.C) is filed under Articles 226 and
3″é27 of Censtxtution sf India, (thxough Telegram)
With these abservations, we close f”tfié 3_
proaeedings.