IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RP.No. 10 of 2009()
1. SRI.S.RAJKUMAR KAMMATH
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION
... Respondent
2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER
3. P.RAMESH BABU
For Petitioner :SMT.R.RANJINI
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH
Dated :19/01/2009
O R D E R
A.K.BASHEER & THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JJ.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R.P.NO.10 OF 2009
in
W.A.No.2231 OF 2008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 19th day of January, 2009
O R D E R
Basheer, J:
Petitioner seeks review of the judgment contending
interalia that even if he approaches the revisional authority as
indicated in the judgment, the contentions that may be raised
by him are not likely to be considered in their proper
perspective, in view of certain observations made therein.
2. We fail to understand as to why the revisional
authority will not consider the revision petition on its merit and
in accordance with law. We make it clear that it will be open
to the revisional authority to dispose of the revision petition,
uninfluenced and untrammelled by any of the observations
made in the judgment, which were of course only a “prima
facie expression of opinion,” as indicated in the judgment
itself.
2
R.P.NO.10/2009
The review petition is disposed of in the above terms.
(A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE)
(THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE)
cl