High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ram Bilash Mukhiya vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Ram Bilash Mukhiya vs The State Of Bihar on 26 August, 2010
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Cr.Misc. No.15708 of 2010
              RAM BILASH MUKHIYA, S/o Jitan Mukhiya.
                              Versus
                       THE STATE OF BIHAR
                             -----------

04. 26.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offences under Sections 341, 332 and 353/34

of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B) A, 26

and 35 of the Arms Act.

The petitioner was allowed bail by order

dated 31.03.2010 vide Cr. Misc. No. 10172 of 2010

on condition that an affidavit would be filed in his

regard that he had fair antecedents. However, since

the petitioner was an accused in three other cases

such an affidavit could not be filed.

However, since the petitioner is in custody

since 02.02.2010 and the petitioner’s father

undertakes responsibility for petitioner’s conduct

after his release from jail custody, let the petitioner,

above named be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed

by the Court to the satisfaction of Additional Chief
2

Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in

connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 7 of 2010 (G.R.

No. 100 of 2010) subject to the following conditions:-

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy

as to how he is related with the petitioner and the

other bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The

bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there

is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That

the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will

inform the court concerned if the petitioner is

implicated in any other case of similar nature after

his release in the present case and thereafter the

court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding

for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he

will receive the police papers on the given date and be

present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do

so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well

represented on each date and if he fails to do so on

two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be
3

cancelled.

In view of the antecedents of the petitioner,

the petitioner is directed to appear before the Supdt.

of Police, Madhubani within fifteen days of his release

with a copy of this order and thereafter every two

weeks for the next nine months. The conduct of the

petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by

the S.P. concerned and if it is found wanting in any

respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned

by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail

for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the

Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by

the petitioner before the court concerned.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-