Sri M V Surayanarayana Setty vs Sri M Sampangiramaiah on 14 October, 2008

IN THE H!GH COURT OF KA-RNATAKA AT BA1~§£§{AIA.. " 4'  _ : 2-.   .

Dated this the 34"' October, 2909  , . jj}_ »  V'

Before

YHE H0N'1zz.E MRJUSHCE.4{1ULi;«'.1_i%£Z)I G, "

mm F:r.¢ApP€3 ».:'"1'92s / "2aa.§* 

1 Sn" M V Suryanarayana Setty, 82133;'
S/oIateVenkaiah   ..
Prop: Swa1ny.Pro!=risiot;_iStorea.:   ' 
#24,  '   
Barlgalfiied"  V      '

2    
S!pMV'Stttymax3ya23_a Sam: .

3 sfizvfmgkatésrz,    .'
S/o M"'J__S'arya1i.':_rayt3x:a seay

_ are assisting 1" appellant in

 i~Ii8__1'I3J8§s1css  rfa # 201

« ,_ '..?ezi§zatapjxa_Building, Cubbonpet
V   Bangalore 2 Appeiiants

(By  ('i§angadh&r  .   "annual, Adv.)

x V'  n 'T ..Sri  Satnpangkaznaiah, 61 yrs

"  Sic lateGMudéappa
Pvt.Sc2'vicc

  Sn'MManjunath, 48yrs

S./o late G Muddappa
Service in BM_'i"C



Both are rla ii 24, 2"' Cross
Cuhbenpet Main Road, Bangalore 18 Rmndents

(By Sri L S Chikkanagoudar, Adv.)

This First Appeal 3 filed under s.9e,  :5 asids 
judgment mad mm dated :1:/.2093 in 035007/zoos oi: the !iie"rgf.t!1e xx;

Addt. City Civil Judge, Bmgaioxc only in so mag  Ilge 
the respondentslplaintiifs for ejcctment and thézgby disntissitagtiic suit with

costs. _ ‘

This First Appeal cemm’ g 6::’ fm’ day, the Court
delivered the following: ” . i _

. ..

Counsel have akeady
taken possessioiav of in qfiéfiiiggg. as such, the appeal be dismissed

as not pressed.

. 1’0 5353335 V”S’ilHA , appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-»
Judge