High Court Kerala High Court

P.K.Appachan vs State Of Kerala on 1 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
P.K.Appachan vs State Of Kerala on 1 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 3714 of 2009()


1. P.K.APPACHAN, PULINIKUMKALAYIL,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. MANOJ THOMAS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.GOPALAKRISHNA KURUP

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN

 Dated :01/12/2009

 O R D E R
                             P.S.GOPINATHAN, J.
                             -------------------------------
                             Crl.R.P.No.3714 of 2009
                            --------------------------------
                    Dated this the 1st day of December, 2009

                                       ORDER

The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Ettumanoor in C.C.No.159 of

2002 on his file convicted the revision petitioner for offence under Section 138 of

the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to simple imprisonment for one

month and to pay Rs.60,000/- as compensation under Section 357(3) of the Code

of Criminal Procedure to the second respondent who was the complainant. In

Criminal Appeal No.501 of 2006 while confirming the conviction the sentence

was reduced to imprisonment till rising of the court and a fine of Rs.60,000/-in

suppression of the order to pay compensation. Fine if realized was ordered to be

paid to the second respondent under Section 357(1) (b) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure. Now this revision.

2. Today when the revision petition came up for admission, the learned

counsel submitted that he is seeking only time for payment of compensation. The

submission made by the learned counsel is recorded and this revision petition is

dismissed. The revision petitioner is granted six months time to pay the fine. Till

then, the bail bond executed by the revision petitioner shall remain in force.

P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE

Skj.