Urmila Devi And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 11 November, 2009

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH.

                                                  C.W.P. No. 17271 of 2009
                                           DATE OF DECISION : 11.11.2009

Urmila Devi and others

                                                          ... PETITIONERS
                                   Versus
State of Haryana and others

                                                       ..... RESPONDENTS


CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL


Present:    Mr. Ravindra Jain, Advocate,
            for the petitioners.

                         ***

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL , J. ( Oral )

The petitioners, who are wife, sons and daughter of Govind

Prasad, working under the UHBVNL and is now not traceable, have filed

the instant petition for setting aside the order dated 7.9.2006 (Annexure P-

10), whereby claim of petitioner No.1 for family pension has been rejected

on the ground that since prior to the receipt of the un-traced report of the

employee from the police, his services were terminated, therefore, petitioner

No.1 is not entitled for family pension.

After arguing for some time, counsel states that the petitioners

may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the said

termination order in accordance with law.

Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

November 11, 2009                           ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL )
ndj                                                  JUDGE