...--... _--u-...... --u nun-u-rnuruu-s aliiill ujafann VI' l\J'lI\8ll'1Il"|I\l'1 I111!!! In-fiildfil \Jl"' RRKNHIHHR 31'?" $90"! 01'' C
II:
NI
In
..T'' 11%' £383' £30316?" £33' A'i.:'w':':'-«'A".2".t'a..e's'Za's A?'
mama THIS TH 23" may as JJENUARY 2993"-f ' --«._f_
PRES}-.315"
am .HON'B££ MR.JUST1'-CE' 3z=a*z.%.K 2 V
we .
zm HON"B1££' :~m.JzIs*:'Ic:£r FJLM.§!~32v}1__ ..
an P.No.13.50/2909 s w. 9. avg; j2~..1:42.32ae9
BETWEEN :
---- ----.------.---;u--
'if stmmmmnrm _ V
AGED ABOU'1' $9__ 33,335.'; 1
sic: amsrgz A.
No.25 g.r;s:;z>u V
APPAJRE'Ea.;'Afi .'.': ' r
BA1if3AI.OE'{Ei%56£'?';V4(33,B'»..." ' ymzcrxennn
{B-yEE«1V:--:'.'-- 3 S_V.$.'§.V§ifA.SI{'?¢]:';"§i'I:IUSI-Es1*I, AEVCCATEI
-transom-cv--La--
. 1., _E§TATE--Ei¢¥3§K cs): rmmn.
BRANCH
~. '--..BA2¢€.A1.ca:x;'»56o 683
Bmrxsmnxn BY ms
'mflmizfin REPRESENTATIVE
~._sxi K H mm mmmu
Emynmma
1-: H mm 9.29.:-1:11:41: .5 Co...
2~f.16, 4*" Guess
an
1=e..T.memz, ammcm
W N1
awe M z~:e.§33
2'" FLOOR; SAHPZEGE man
:a -sac noes
.-an-u
- -A-?_.-.-nf--- vw -v-m-Manna mun uuum U!' RAKNAIAKA 91:0!-I COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C
A33 ALSO AT SURRHJX Rflhfi
NEAR SURARJI C0*OPERATIVE SOCIETY
PANJA HDUSE, P.Q.SURANJI
M%NGALORE*574 I49
SINCE DECEASED BY LEG%L
R£PRESEHT£TIVES .=W-,
gamma *
we LATE K H ABDIIL
RIREIQUE _
Sm LATE K H mpuL
B-ABRP:.9EER' _
9/o LATE 1; H aapun .
ammmf ~
sic max
33ER3$H "¥C_.* =: -%w9
HM 3.'£'sTEj,K H' AZBDHL matmm
5»:/''aa:r~a* TO pmxwmxerznl
'-mo 'La'-2'32: '1: H mmrz. ammm
\._ scx::3::::I_E"«j*..--'~;71I.:>.£sE, mrxpzazm may
IiA
tmwx . . . nmsmrmmws
was 23.95. FILED mama. ARTICLES 225 mm
2 03* 'I'HEZ cmwrzwzrzmq as INDIA PRAYING are
gguasn tr:-IE warm. nr.2e.:z.1.2r2oa msssn 32' mm
.. . I233': RECOVERY APPELLETE TRIBUNAL,
AND 338/2603 23»: U.R.A.21!2oo8 are
ANHEXURE*E.
Q"
GHEHKRI IR
..-.. .M_,.._..... .. .................. .-...... Wu... Ur nnnwnlnnn mu-rs count or mxmrnxa men comer os KARNATAKA HIGH c
(at
THESE PETITIONS COMING 02»? ESE PRELIIHRRRY
rmsmme THIS mm, BEEFAK mm, J.,
FOLLOWING:
Heard 3:21 B s shasizxi-».;4A49i§;i_:s:'hanT
Counael appearing fat ..¢,n Ehe '1;,:2et;.'§,Vf¢§:i._paii§:: jf' 'V1911
adxuissian.
2. Tzaesey ' »~:V..'.f%'«3:lad under
Articles 22s§"";L:i3"'_V2g:?« i:1i§ 'j""'caVnf;at1tution of
Imtiia, passed by rm
Debt Chennai on
2 6 . 11 . 26:15" aj.n' Q§SL§§é§D'l._i 9:a"9~n1very of Debta Due to Banks and
Institutians Act, 1993. But at the
aztzcsuzzt aought ta he recovered against
patitianar and respondents Ntam? to 8
hsrain, petitioner hem been directed ta
depoasit R.s.12,50, 8001* with respondent Ho.l–
wemgmmz tn Mmxxiez er W..llM.!lL:c.r¢¢z¢6. m
1615!!
– ~’-A.-_w§-n- ‘Hr: nnnnunnnnn rm.-In LUUKJ ur KAKNAIAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT Oi’ KARNATAKA HiGH C
lb
Bank in two installments, subject ,_to
compliance thexeax, imgugned. exact’ hag “5£§fi_
stayed and. appeal has been. diractafi* fig Thé ‘
heard an merits. This interim-m;d§:{ ié $éing7,u
challenged on variety at gr§und§{
4. However, wa ‘fi§d_V fifi» flc§a§3 mrcr
interferanae has b§én fl#éf§#§;.Ev#fi if ths
patitianer was ankg g gfigfigfififigffié tha loan
taken by thg §:£§c§pag £e§§§§er} fine liability
of tbs b$@r§fi%f ‘afi&i1£h$tR§of’ tha guarantor
would V as team by the
Debt Ré¢qve:y’$£ibfififii;”
«§;v* Lea2fimd:HQaunae1 ____ far the petitioner
A” ¢Q@tend§dyfi§a§ in View of tha finding recaxdad
hf friSfi$glQ”xna liability cauld have been
fasféne&a6fi him. We as not find any marit on
A._ th£”$§§ am ultimately in the czder paaaud by
.fltfig “Debt Recavary Tribunal, Bangalore on
%1 ié2%.:m.2oo7, liability hem of course, baen
tastaned an this petitioner as wall. It is
not neceaaany for us to examine the merits of
7@>