High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Md.Tamanna Haidar vs State Of Bihar on 28 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Md.Tamanna Haidar vs State Of Bihar on 28 July, 2011
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.41302 of 2008
    Md.Tamanna Haidar, son of Late Haider Ali, village Mathurapur, PS Warisnagar, Dist.
                                Samastipur - Petitioner.
                                         Versus
                                     State Of Bihar
                                        -----------

2 28.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

This application has been filed for quashing the order,

dated 21.4.2008 passed in Warisnagar PS Case No. 241/2007 by

the C.J.M, Samastipur by which cognizance for the offences under

sections 341, 323, 379, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Penal Code.

The First Information Report has been instituted on

behalf of the Principal of the Madrasa wherein he claims that at

about 8 AM the petitioner came and threatened to kill him and

some other persons. It is also alleged that he took away Rs.5000/-

from his house.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on

bare perusal of the First Information Report it is evident that no

case is made out under section 323, much less, under section 307

of the Penal Code.

This court has not issued notice to the informant in

this case as the State counsel amply represents the interest of the

informant. The First Information Report does not disclose that any

overt act was committed nor does it disclose that any injury was

inflicted upon the informant and as such this court prima facie

finds that the allegations made in the First Information Report are
2

false. If the petitioner had any interest in killing the informant, he

would have done so, as apparently there was no one to stop him

from killing the informant at the time of the occurrence.

I accordingly remand the matter back to the C.J.M,

Samastipur to hear the parties and specifically the objection raised

on behalf of the informant and pass appropriate orders in the case,

subject to the fact that charges have not been framed in the case.

This application is disposed of with the aforesaid

observation.

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to produce a copy

of this order before the court concerned within one month failing

which this application shall stand dismissed.

haque                                          ( Sheema Ali Khan, J.)