Gujarat High Court High Court

Ramnarayan vs State on 7 October, 2008

Gujarat High Court
Ramnarayan vs State on 7 October, 2008
Author: J.R.Vora,&Nbsp;Honourable Mr.Justice D.Dave,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/123/8808	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 12388 of 2008
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1224 of 2005
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

RAMNARAYAN
SHIVRAM KEVAT - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
THROUGH
JAIL for Applicant(s)
: 1, 
MR DABHI, APP for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for
Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE SHARAD D.DAVE
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 07/10/2008 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.R.VORA)

1. Rule.

Waived by learned APP Mr.Dabhi.

2. This
application is preferred by the convict prisoner through jail to
release him on temporary bail for 30 days for his mental sickness and
on contention that even though he has been treated in the jail, he is
not improved.

3. Looking
to the record, a medical certificate dated 16.9.2008 is produced of
Medical Officer, Jail Dispensary, Central Jail, Vadodara which
indicates in clear terms that the applicant is properly treated at
SSG Hospital by Psychiatrist and for regular follow up on every
Wednesday, a team of Doctors is visiting at the jail. It is also
mentioned in the certificate that there is improvement in the mental
condition of the patient and the patient i.e. the applicant is well
and there is no complaint regarding mood, sleep, irritability etc.
In view of this, there is no ground at all to release the applicant
on temporary bail. However, perusing the jail remarks, it is found
that furlough leave requested by the applicant, first, second and
third on 6.1.2004, 6.2.2006 and 6.2.2008 are awaiting decision at the
hands of the concerned authority. It is, therefore, directed that
the concerned authority shall decide three furlough requests of the
applicant immediately.

4. The
application, therefore, stands dismissed. Rule discharged.

(J.R.Vora,J)

(Sharad
D.Dave,J)

pathan

   

Top