IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16?" DAY OF JULY 2010".,,'f"--«_:"':_ BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.3usT1cE...3.AwA_-5'F§As%.:s}A" C.R.P. NO. 49:'g'.;_,Q;;Q'~ BETWEEN: THE MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.GOD GRANITES, f - No.77, 15* MAIN," ~ . VIVEKANANDANAGARA, f E3ANGALOF<E_-~ 560085: " ~ A MR.B.VE'N?§AI'ESFi, ; S/O AI;,_BAB'U.,' I AGED AB-(BUT '4:8»Y'E.f\RS*~.,,.,~ . V 1111 _ " PETITIONER (BY SR1.fS_t~1EFiAR_&'«.KUMA.R, ADV., *._AND SRI.i?-RASA'F-é,N'A. KUMAR, ADv.,) AND: C [S MT. GO'V'\!P....A..EVa MA, W,/_O«.__C.M.MADAIAH, ~._A<:;_E.D ABOUT 48 YEARS, R50 CHANNAMANAHALLI VILLAGE, KYLjA!'iJCHA HOBLLRAMANAGARA TALUK, ,.,_'BA.N'GALORE RURAL DISTRICT ., NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD., BRANCH OFFICE, NO.2B, UNITY BUILDING ANNEX, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE -- 560 027 &\,i:I,__... RESPONDENTS
2
THIS C.R.P FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE C.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THAT PART OF THE JUDGMENT
AND AWARD DATED 13~11-2009 IN M.v.c NO.768/1997
PASSED BY THE LEARNED MEMBER, ADDL. iVE.A.C.T &
PRINCIPAL CIVIL 3UDGE (SR. DN), RAMANAGARA, T:=–:..ERESY
PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM OF THE RESPONDENTN_O.1
HEREIN AND FIXING THE LIABILITY ON THE.g>ETITION..ER
HEREIN; ” :.-
This petition coming on for Vord»ers this
made the foilowing
The petitioner has quc–‘st’i«O’VnedV”the’ awarrciii’ pjai5,$ed_i3unide:IfI»
Section 166 of the Motor Ve_hii”c!,,es~._/§\ct..” Linciouvbtediyi the
aggrieved person has”r.eii’ne(i_y __under Section 173
of the Act. In this view-,v~vreivisiono_u”nti_er””.S’e’ction 115, C.P.C.
is not .IiT1aIEnt.§i’F;naioiei’-an’dV_i’s’ciisposeci of as such for statistical
purposepsf _ ‘
2. I’ ” ,Ho\Aieve’_r;”1at the request of the learned counsei for
the pe’tit.’o:ne_r, he is permitted to convert it into M.F.A.
of the Motor Vehicles Act. Needful to be
done v*I_’i’t’tai.n””two days.
sefa
RIDGE