W.P. N0. 62670/2009 (S~R.ES)
MISC.W.Nos.60i97/2010
& 61508/2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF' FEBRUARY,
BEFORE _.J "
THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE 1%
WP. No. 52670/20459 Ié--'HHs«I Ame '
MESC.W.Nos.6019'7 /201,0 61508/'2Qo9
Between:
1
'''' *IIvn,$t:7.uc1fi.:e,;IW, 'Be'lgaur'rI*vD--ivision
The State 0fKarnata1I;~I;~c:oI:-j of ,P1:I.b1iQ\'I.,,T3_ V' ' "
B¢Ig;I,I;n3 PETITIONERS
(By {\"_ B PISA)
éU}L_D_i
5 2 Z\/iaiiikarjiifiéhivalingayya
_V '«.HiIfCm_ath
(lead by his LRS
. .(é1'}'I--.V.SIr1antabai
W/C Makkikarjun Hirernath
{:1 yrs, OCC: heusehoid work
I"; I) Yadwad, Taiuk: Gokak
Bcigaum District.
(b) Semganabasayya
S»/C Maiiikarjun Hiremath
32 yrs, r/0 Yadwad, Taluk: Gokak
ficrkgaum District.
W.P. No. 62670/2009 (S-RES)
MiSC.W.Nos.60!97/2010
& 6E 508/2009
(c; Shivakurnar
S/o Maliikarjun Hirernath
30 yrs, r/o Yadwad, Taluk: Gokak
Belgaum District.
2 The Chairman/Secretary
Viciyavardhak Sangh -
GNS Composite P.U.Co11ege
Yadwad, Taluk: Gokak it
(By Sri V M Sheelavant, Aciy for R--1iit-023 . _ .V
Sri Sangrarn S Ku1karni,'"Adv for R4) .
This WP is filed under'Articles_*226 & 227 of the
Constitution of India,VV--prayingto qtiasth-[the order passed
by the _ Pr1.i)ist;Judg_e«: .._8z,W_'v._VEA'i", Belgaurn in
E.P.No.61.6j/20:34Vdat-ed1;2V~9~2OO6' Vida' Annexure--D in so
far as pe.ti'tion__e'r2is'_Vr:ori.ce_rr'ied';*
__is.fi1ed under Section 151 CPC
r/W Articles 1 226.. '81, "22.'? " of the Constitution of India,
prayingito' pass an 'o_rderT'for early hearing.
1 :5-p/Iisr';.W.Eii15"O8/2009 is filed under Section 151 CPC
1' Fr,/w _Ar.tic.1c"=--226 of the Constitution of India, praying to
VS,_t'VEi3r i'AVi.o"peration of judgment passed by the
' ._ Pr1y;Dis«t.f_gJ:§1ci~ge 85 EAT, Belgaum in E.P.No.616/2004 dated
2-9--2QO6gvide Anexi.ire--D in so far as the petitioner is
conce.rned'; pending disposal of the writ petition.
This WP and Misc.W.Nos.60197/2010 85
it 'rAV_ii61--5iO8/12009 coming on for orders this day, the Court
;made the following-
w.i>. No. 6267012009 (S-RES)
MiSC.W.i\Eos.60i97/2030
& 6ISG8f2009
ORDER
By consent of learned counsel appearivnglon
both sides, the writ petition is heard on me_rfit’s’an~d _
being disposed of by this order. 9
2. This writ petition by the:4St::_tate:’of
directed against the orderdated i4~’9§i2QOoiV:(An’n.e;;1ireei
D) passed in Execution / The
Execution Petition the judgment
dated 13~8–2(}t)’3_.’pas’sied’by Appeilate
Triburiah K.P.E.I.Appeal
tphnewpetitioner is that in the
absenicepii V on it in the aforesaid
judgment pay theivamount due to deceased Sri
éihiiizalingayya Hiremath who was
Master with respondent No.2 ~–
Institi,itioiri~’;ithe Executing Court has erred in law in
.. the petitioner also liable to pay the amount.
i “‘._iH’ov’vever, this submission is contested by the iearned
Vcounsel appearing for the respondents.
‘zgkijg
W.P. No. 62670/2009 (S=-RES)
MlSC.W.Nos.6{}l97/2010
& 615083009
3. Therefore, the only question that arises_,__for
determination is as to whether any liability is
the petitioner– State of Karnataka to pay 1 V’
due to the aforesaid deeeased
Shivalingayya Hirernath underi:’the’–_lj.ndgn;.ent.
i3–8–2oo3 passed by the
4. Learned V spetiifically
invited my attentionaltoliggtheil tV’o11_:l(:)~:a,’i’ifr..v-i’.”9ai_ir,i_’jobservations
made by the at para
26 of its jiidgrn’en.t”‘ivhi(‘}hs as: under:
……….. .. As already
V ” discas.s;ed'”~ab’ov’e, there are indications
to_sho_w1that_.for the relevant period, the
“rnanagerr}.-ent has received grant from
the “–Ed_ttcation Department also. When
such being the case, I am of the opinion
V._tha_t primarily the management is
9’ responsible for the emoluments for
i j ufhich the appellant is entitled and they
‘~f’may seek for reimbursement of the
same from the Government in the event
of they are not provided with the
required grant. ……… ..”
5. A perusai of the aforesaid observations wouid
clearly indicate that respondent No.2 herein has to
WP. N0. 62670/2009 (S~RES)
MlSC.W.N0s.60E97/ZOEO
& 61508/2009
first pay the amount due under the judgment and
after making the payment, it is at liberty to
reimbursement from the State Governmeiit
required grant was not provided»-.tQ
impugned order fixing the liability
liable to be set asider Ae§:Qrdingl.y,’ the
following order: p g l V l l
The impugned insofar as
it relates to liable to pay
the -set aside. The Writ
petitielnlll ltillllaecordingly. In View of
disposal Misc.W. Nos. 60197/2010
85 eisosiflfmiegivdisdssieiiid disposed of.
tipn of .
% $d/«
3* @333
is SD/- ”