Sri Ismail S/O Moosan vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 30 June, 2009

"W-~ "W-"M wwwvw wt: mwmmwmwmwm mmwm wwwmfi W?' §*k,fiw%%"°rWWM§'&.fl WEWM QUUKW U?" Kfifimfiufififlfi Wigfi Cwfifi

II
I-3
I.

IN THE H133 COURT' OF KARNATAKA AT 

may mrs em 39*' may or JUNE 

BEFORE

mt HOH"BL».£' p1e...ms~2'rv.,)

an-we IwIIIuuu-_it ''

1:$m'.cm;t£}ImL INSURANCE :30. mm,
  BUILDING
._ %'Lm3:¢'%*<R0@-'fi»%A" P'm'I'UR 13.x. ,
A ,I'>w4x: £m4t"'Mi'|Q*F£I£'"%I8u'9""MtVc!?"&\ mzwmvzam Wmr"¢«:w*tw$*i*'$=

:2:

JU 

The agpellantr' claimant: ix 

Court made: Sacticn 173:1] ofw

Vehicles Act, 1988 

cecapansation in INC 1~I>::_.f:.8fV.'{£*<_;f'§G_O-Q 

of Motor Aaszident Cflgaéms %z}:i§m§;_1¥¥zv s. 

Principal Civil Judge nangazmxe, n.1<.
2. with they  coumsel
for the     " 'énta far final

 for the apgenam:
suhmit .s'*-__'_th;nVt ' fin'; -  had sustained the

folfizwinq  ifixjuries but the Tribunal has

  vs:-f B.::.9;200.-'-. The

   the injuries sustained by the

we lzgnexexauaaan.' c .
1"). Abrasion & Ccnntzmizsn {mental region
(Rt) side 4:: 2 ans'

2) 231 an Lac*era.ta<:i wound ewe: fore head
{Rt} aside;

3) Abraaicsn ovextlm aims of face 332

L/%



«-new-mi ca sgw 2 v: "ow mu 'W rm it vvmara; €E\\#<'"""'$\mwz""~¥», rt M Wfi fé '6§mn'%a;J"Wn.;$?lS"$m

 .

II
in

Kahavasz Medical Centre, Genera}. Ho$pitj§lT at

Puttur on 25.9.2004 and treated as

1:.-13.1. 26.9.2094. In View or the ameg ii:j: V.{.;..:?z:(L.*:.<:.'1._

meet the ends of juaxt:it:;i§e»2AA'V»:1:I;éc;«;

ccrapensation or Rs.3.§,_O0oVf~.._. ".,w

catwensation of Rs.9,'":2§'3!- the'

Tribunal .

6. In ‘t1f_1a xésuiflfl” is partly
allowed fiche in
anti ti #6; ~ ” ‘ __ V comp anaati on of

15,Co:t:,_§}-_ –g§”%%?wa;g,§i;:gs£:’Vas’.9.2093- awarded by

the m»m1.a¢¢m3.ag1y, the impugnad

and Aimfgj. afi-9 zmdifiad. Na goats.

‘ T. ~$ej.spondar£t~1naurunc:e Cearmany is

cp*

‘ t:osit the enhanced coczzpansatian
_i§m,oux11: t5~.*i’1’A:’3.’1 the: Tribunal within three manths

\

Sd/-»
Iudge