High Court Karnataka High Court

Dilip vs Mahadev on 22 February, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Dilip vs Mahadev on 22 February, 2010
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA

DATED: THIS THE 22"" DAY OF FEBRUARY ZOIVIOT

BEFORE

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE HULUVADI..G'_.uR»AM.EE'H II 

M.F.A. NO. I302O OI? 2oo'7:m;I  "   J. I 7

BETWEEN

1.

 ~ ssIsfRONI*'RIOAD, BIJAPUR

(By. 3141. SRIizfIANAND PATEL FOR R2:
R--1__

QIIIIIDOMENI' AND AWARD DATED: 7.7.2007 PASSED IN MVC

 _NO.2I;0/05

 __  PARTI,Y ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION
   AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OI: COMPENSATION.

ABIVJAPUR _

Q  BRANCI-TI' MANAO ER

DILIP 7' _
S/O SIDDAPPA GOU_RGOND..... _ 
32 YEARS. OCC 'I'RA__CO_'I'R DRIVER _  _
R/O KANAMADI, BIJAIMR   ;    ';.,AI>PELI.ANT
(By Sri. BASAVARALI R MAfI'H.'~.ADVOCAfI"'I~§]" 

S/"O GURULI ..    ~ I
MAJOR". OC'C_BL.ES3NESE52 
R/O sH_ECaAOI~I__. JATH 

UNITEDIINDIA INSURANCE CO LTD
 RESPONDENTS

SER'V'F%f*'1
 FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE

ON THE FILE OF THE MACT NO.IV. BIJAPUR

'Q5



2

This MFA coming on for hearing, this day, the
Court delivered the foliowing:
JUDGMENT

This appeal filed by the claimant

enhancement of the compensation being not

with the award passed by the MA.CT,__No.Ifsf ‘at. in “‘ it

MVC No.210/2005 dated 7.7.2007: A it A

2. The accident in questioiji is in -The = T’

accident occurred betweeng…..t_he’ “two ‘Vehicles. The

tribunal due to negligence
on theipart’ of the vehicle bearing No.MH«

against the motor cycle in

whiciz. cliairpnant’was__travelling and awarded a sum of

it A leamed counsel for the parties.

it is submitted that the claimant had sustained

of lower third of right femur and also injuries to

‘X,/”

V three months.

chest. and pelvis. The injured is said to be the driver,
but however. no eertifit_:at.e is produced.

5. Taking int.o consideration the nature of
claimant would be entitled to Rs.30,000/~ V’
and suffering’, Rs.9,000/– towards

during treatment period’, to’.zstards ”

conveyance, Rs.4,000/– towartds ‘medical, fie-x1f>enses’.’

9

Rs.56,000/~ towards duflellto disability.
Rsitxooo/–umvanmgieaguf§asafifie§eT?1§§teknnuun
would be entitled together with
interest at of petition till
payment. it t V V t

In V’ of order passed by the

alioiitted in part.

shall deposit the amount

at

f
Li’i§D%'”3§§

‘\.».–~’l