High Court Kerala High Court

K.Ummer vs The Director Of Municipalities on 13 December, 2007

Kerala High Court
K.Ummer vs The Director Of Municipalities on 13 December, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 36802 of 2007(F)


1. K.UMMER,(UNDER ORDER OF TRANSFER)
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPALITIES,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE MANJERI MUNICIPALITY,

3. THE CHAIRPERSON,

4. MECHERI ABDUL AZEEZ @ BAPUTTY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.NARAYANAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :13/12/2007

 O R D E R
                                   V.GIRI,J.

                            -------------------------

                     W.P ( C) No.  36802  of 2007

                            --------------------------

                Dated this the 13th  December, 2007


                              J U D G M E N T

The petitioner who is working as Overseer Grade-I/Building

Inspector in the Manjeri Municipality – the 2nd respondent is

aggrieved by Exhibit-P2 order of transfer passed by the Director

of Municipalities. According to the petitioner, the reason stated

in Exhibit-P2 is baseless. Apparently, there was no complaint by

the Chairman of the Standing Committee for Public Works

against the petitioner, though that is the reason referred to in

Exhibit-P2, contends the learned counsel for the petitioner. He

refers to Exhibit-P3 which is dated 11.12.2007, later in point of

time to the reference made in Exhibit-P2. Learned counsel for

the petitioner contends that the basis for the petitioner’s

transfer seems to be different from what is projected in Exhibit-

P2.

May be there is substance in this contention going by

Exhibit-P3. In my view, the petitioner’s grievance will have to be

looked into by the 1st respondent in the first instance. A copy of

the writ petition has been served on the standing counsel for the

Municipality.

W.P ( C) No. 36802 of 2007

2

In the result,this writ petition is disposed of permitting the

petitioner to file a representation seeking revocation or variation

of Exhibit-P2 order of transfer, before the 1st respondent. If he

files a representation in this regard, within one week from today,

it shall be looked into and appropriate decision shall be taken,

after hearing the petitioner and, if necessary, after calling for

remarks from the Manjeri Municipality, within three weeks

thereafter.

(V.GIRI, JUDGE)

ma

W.P ( C) No. 36802 of 2007

3

K.THANKAPPAN,J

CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999

ORDER

25th May, 2007