High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Jitendra Yadav @ Kariman Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 24 June, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Jitendra Yadav @ Kariman Yadav vs State Of Bihar on 24 June, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr.Misc. No.19734 of 2010
           JITENDRA YADAV @ KARIMAN YADAV, SON OF SRI RAM LAKHAN
           YADAV
                                           Versus
                                    STATE OF BIHAR
                                         -----------

2. 24.06.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Section 376(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner was refused bail earlier by an order

dated 26.8.2009 vide Cr. Misc. 28100 of 2009 considering the

statement of the girl in the First Information Report as well as

given under Section 164 Cr. P.C.

It has been submitted that now the trial is going on in

which the victim has been examined as PW-2 but did not

support the case of prosecution.

In view of such, let the petitioner above named, who

is in custody since 18.1.2009, be released on bail on furnishing

bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of 1st Additional Sessions

Judge, (Special Judge), Gaya, in Sessions Trial No. 67 of 2009

arising out of Kothi P.S. Case No. 2 of 2009 subject to the

following conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the

other shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailor will
2

undertake to furnish information to the court about any change

in address of the petitioner. (ii)That the bailor shall also state on

affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner

is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release

in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the

ground of misuse. (iii)That the petitioner will be well represented

on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates,

his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali