BETWEEN:
£N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
DATED THIS THE 232%: ms' 01:' .3t1L*i{ 2t:j=c:._§"'
PRESENT"-.fii
THE HONBLE MR. M). vD:NA'i09
" i;;s,_NARA:%;;:MH5 'P¢1UR'¥"i~'}'§""
._ S/O "P;mT$u4BH«I,MRA0 SINDHE
AGRicUL1fzsRis'1*T-a.&. "i?fRESIDE1\E'F,
'L5§:KENAHALI,1"-:}Rp;M PANCHAYAT
R10 LAKKENAHALLI VILLAGE,
SOLUR H0'B:.:'-
. }N!AGAD°i--TA_£,IJvE{,
?--.";'%AMANAGARAM~57 3 5 1 1
' -- 2s,iAN;jLuNATH
':§;;":0 iHANUMA:AH
:aG1~1%};CUL'rURIsT
MEMBER OF' GRAM PANCHYAT
" _ I~'i;osA:~1ALLI VILLAGE
"MAR1Km>PE POST'
SOLUR' HOBLI, MAGAD: TALUK
RAMANAGARAM msmlcr 57151 1
M.G.I'~¥AGARAJU
S] O G.C.GANGAPPA
AGRICUi..TUF2iS'¥'
MARIKUPPE VILLAGE fir. POST
SOOLIBELE HOBLI
MAGAIBI TALUK w
RAMANAGARAM DISTRICT 5'7_3 $1 '1' * V'
G.NARASIMHAIAH
S/O GANGALAH
HGSAHALLE VILLAGE *
SOLUR HOBLI,
MARIKUPPE F'(§:3'}."' _
MAGA§)lTALUK-- ~ - -
RAMANAGARAM u1sT§s:Ib31'
M.m,«:AH,:§«mRANgAIAri 'V
3/ C). LAT5§3T.HiMMA1AH._" if; V .
w1AR1;{r;Jp'I>r3=..VIi;1T;;-'ac§E_ 5.; ms'?
s0LIJR--i;LQBL.I_,'~. " A
"MAG;§;DI 'I*2;L:J1<;, _
RAM1§PI'JV}ARA'5_?'i5} 1.
}?QX§»§}§i»Af§ -_ A
' ~ _HUCI~§A_iAH
* , _Hi::sAHALL.1___v2LLAGE
e:;L%,;R HQBL1, MARIKUPPE POST'
'» MAGADI TALUK,
* .. _ F:'AM15:NAGARA 57 15 1 1
GQVINDAPPA
_ Sf LATE KARIYAEWA
x "§:jIOSAHALLI VELLAGE
g__SOL'UR HOBLI, MARIKUPPE POST
MAGAD! TALU K,
RAMAEIAGARA 5? 15 1 1
VENKATESH
S] 0 LATE GOVINDAPPA
HOSAHALLI VELLAGE
SOLUR HOBLI, MARIKUPPE 90$?
MA(3ADi TALUK,
RAMANAGARA 571511
9 SURESH
S/O LATE GANGANNA _
KEMPACHl¥{I{ANAI~IALL__I VILLAGE
SOLUR HOBLX, MARlKI_.K+'PE POST' --
MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA.=5f?'151. -.
:0 M G RAMESH ' __
3/0 LATE GANGAPPA' ._
MARiKI.jPFE VjiLLA(3 E s;'«i§aSr'- ~ '
SOLUR
V " MAf3};DI 'V'§i%i'L-{}'K.
RAMAMQARAM '1:».;'s'rr<1c'r 57 :5 1 1
1:: ;2:HwA1AH _ ._
3/0., LATE-\.mRA1.AH
' - _MAR1;-:I_.: f'PE VILLAGE 85 POST
__}S:')vLUR H(}.EI.»E,
MACLADI TALUK,
»R',1XfMA'NAGARA 57 15 1 1
"1-2 Mfr»: VEERANAGAIAH
5:-";,!. Gs LATE NAGADASAPPA
.. MARIKUPPE VILLAGE 3:. POST
._SOLUR HOBLI,
MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA 321511 PETITIONERS
(By Sr:i:U.SHIVAKUMAR FOR S & S ASSOCIATES
1 TEE SFATE OF KARNATAKA
BYITS SECRETARY
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ; é
SACHIVALAYA 1: "
M.S.I§3UILl3ING
BANGALORE 1
2 ASSISFANT EXECUTIVE §;vNG1..NEER-
PUBLIC woRKs~~1)EP_;aRTM331~:_*I" %
THIRUMALE R(}Ai).. --. " ..
MAGAIHTALUK J V . ~
f?AMANAGARANI"E%? 1'51 1'
3 ASS1f$TAi§%'I'_EXECUTIV"§§-- ENGINEER
ZILLA §?:*kN'{3§iAYM-'-_S'U.3,~DIViSION
MAGAD.E:"}TALUK'--. ~ _
'RAM_A'PIAG25;RAM. ,5'-.7 15 1' I '
4 "'--TA'HsiL.p'M§AL..
MAGADI 'TALEK " " '
M3531 §
-- » RAMArs;AGA'RAM 57151 3
?ElYLA.NARASA§AH S/Q NARASEMAIAH
_V .,VHO'3AHALLI VELLAGE
._S{)LUR_I_i.1{}BLI
NEARIKTUPPE ms'?
MAG;££D§ TALUK
" RAMANAGARAM 571511. RESPGNDENTS
,. U1, 2"
~ {By sii:t;N1L0U§«'ER AKBAR ABEL. sow. ADV. )
. THIS WP. ES FILED IFWAYING: TO CALL FOR
RECORDS AND DIRECT THE RFISPONIEENTS 1 TC} 4 TO
'' "DEVESLPO THE ROAD IN SY.NO.}.6 GP' LAKKENAHALLI
VILLAGE, SOLUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, AS PER
GOVERNMENT N€)Tfi3'ICA'I'fON NO. 128/2001-02 DT.
1312,2001 AS MENTIONED AT ANELNX-'A ANS ALLOW THE
Lakkenhalli village, Solur Hobii, J Magadi afi§1 na;:;§sa.
road was passing through the siajci :;':ur?eyqt_1um"bef is
an undisputed fact VA
rcsprmdents. The said S_x:}f=,No.}6 and
respondents 1 to for the said
purpose to om; K. centractor vide Work road in question, there iS: Viryaad to Hosahaili éillid
__con’e;;actor has almost completed
90% to him and couid not carry out
11:33′ Wqrk béming Sy.No.16 Where the public road
” . fiimngh fcjégthe reasons that the fifih respofident was
obstructing for the said groject. (311 an
peiitioners came to know thai fifih respondent
AA jfileéivéitit 0.S.No.441/2002 on the file of the Pr1.Civi1 Judge
<35 JMFC1, "Magadi and obtained an order of
temparary injuncficn against regpondcats 1 to 4. Fourfih
respondent alone filad the Written statement. Other
respandents have not filed any written statement or
K)
fifth respomient is illegally resiraining gghe
road which is against public interest.
6. Learned AGA., suhm;;££é锑-£;hva:, {‘}1e~, : ‘
permanent injunction granted _ suit,
laid in Sy.No.16 and petitioi1:::»1 ‘§~a11: miiéf
as sought for in the writ petititirx? “n. _ a
7’. We ,_have A.g*;vcn. cfezisiderafion to the
COfi°.i€fl{i()jfiS’vjQf ccunsei appearing for the parties
and ficmiéniscfi on mcord.
j8. ‘méite1.*ia}.«;3n record would clttarly Show that
” V’ A amad ‘ifi’é§:(ist¢nce which yassas through Sy.No,16
respemient. The asgahalting of the road till
1’fi”3~}3-ézlenging to the fiftll mspondent is completed by
theӢeiztIactor and thenizfare, in View of the injunction order
‘ , :>gui~;-_~ntcé against defmaants 1 to 4 in the suit flied by
respenéent was in 0.s.No.441/29:32 which has zaeen
ciecresd, fufiihz:-:1″ asphalting couid not be dans. This court
\/?
10
eamlot issue a direction which is Contvaxy
decree passed by a competent ciIV.?i1W(V:e’u:’t_ and.; i’1’1t0i 7.
4 ca,1:mo’t undertake CORStI’i1Cfl’0__I1:”_VOf ” in
permanent injunction V
O.S.No.4(}1/ 2002. Re:-gjondeiiteh to the said
suit and it is open judgment and
(iecree passediitx. is also open to the
pefitieneie” _tx1?£§3::~’V_’ji;V;i:fi$ent and decree in
accé:idaneeVV§vif§I. the said judgment and decree
against zespondeats 1 to 4 is
aside eeeetilaieee with law, it would not be possible for
” « issue direciiens to respondents 1 1:0 4 to lay the
1 3 eland beionging to the fifth respondent iil
S1y.Ng:; 15: the same is Centrary to the judgment and eiecree
AA by the competent civi} court anti under the
V’-Cii”‘7i71}.!;I1S’£81’}iC€S, we held that this PIL is miseameeived and is
filed to ever come the judgment and {iecree passeei in
O.S.Ne.441/2002 and petitioners are not entitled to any
relief in the said writ petiiion and it is epven to them to work
\’/9»
‘ii
{mt thcir remedy to set 3816:: the judgmfzxgp_L;1id*< fd'£fcx:ee
passed in O.S.No.441/2002 in acconiancs
Aceordingiy, the writ p<:ijii€$i1"'i:s«_{";&is',1;33'i:s4;svv-Lil V:wif}113:11ebj'
above said obsttxvafions. N, «. VV
% % %
" jC"hi'gef Iustice
" » ; %;% JUDGE
%%%%%
' i§_rde;x4; '{é::1/'No -' I
" . Web N0