High Court Karnataka High Court

Mohammed Saleem vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 April, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Mohammed Saleem vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 April, 2009
Author: H.N.Nagamohan Das
IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKAQ     

czacurr BENCH AT £_\.ir4éAFf,'T\.5lAl"):'T   4%
omen THIS "ms 22"" EMTTG'? Ai>'u'a1f%:;,T.'za;TT:3§;:._ETT.
B3E*'oRE  T    

HON' BLE MR. ;J.US1'I(:.E.TT§l';v--N';'-~!§AG}\'M'OHAé'~§ DAS

 

CRIMINAL :i5E'I'£TI.   ___,ji§_§*iI fi;éT.7§4og2oc9
BETWEEN:     T' T 
MOHAMMETJ$ii£;EEM':_:   
son or Mozwames 4G€}iJSE.AMUJAVAR,
AGED_ABO£}T 3--:3___YEARS_,'    
R/A:HOUSAE.j'N_O.1:_6, sokpsm smear,
sHAmL, £J1'TT£f§RAKANAT\iADA. :PETITIONER

(at SRIB';vRAMESHA3n SR2. BANAND, ADVS.)

T  .    KARNATAKA

5159. ex IT--',9S.H.O.,
Bi~¥ATi<ALTOWN POLICE STATION,

 BHATKAL TALUK, UTTARA KANNADA. RESPONDENT

T 5  SRLANAND K. NAVALGIMATH, HCGP)

THIS PET'ITIC)N IS FILED U/5.439 CR.P.C. PRAYING

 V'  ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME

NO.60/95 OF BHATKAL POLICE STATION.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS BAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ow



ORDER

The Circle inspector of Police, Bhatk-‘;li:–«#oiice,v,’

gave a complaint against the accused _en’d”4’§tise’rs.’for*-the’.

offences punishable under Ss.°:.3, £5 2

Substance Act and S.120S?Voi~’…the came

to be registered in ;__CdmeAp_Ne;’50;*1996;”‘«Thel3very same
Circle Inspector of Ponce. the matter and has

now filed chargefsheet”i’n for the offences

punisneb:-eftlndeiiigp 5 Explosive Substance Act.
This 1′;C;ou:rt; e:lni’Iii’l%soHAfmfAe9A AND omens vs. STATE’
reporteclin 29iLii. K{iCR 1649 held that a police officer

title ..l_persAo’ns–l——–end vested interest in the case should

‘ snotcAb’e:_perrn:i’ited to investigate the case.

in the circumstances, the petitioner is entitled

.. for grant of bait. It is not shown to me as to why the

“kpcustody of the petitioner is to be continued. Any

‘ Flapprehension in the mind of the presecution that the

petitioner may escape from the jurisdiction of the Court

@\\{~..,»x,

and he may tamper with the prosecution witnesses-hen be

removed by putting the petitioner on stringe_nif.soi;rijiti_ons_L’

For the reasons stated aboyeythe é

The petition is hereh’y_4_allewe_d.’– Theypetivtioneiritshellay

geteesa

be released on bail subject follo§vin§eoni§itions:–

she’i’lV’vexecute a self bond for a

with a soivent surety for

li’i<esiirn=._stohthe satisfaction of the Sessions

~ petitioner shall attend the Court on ali

A hearing date: regularly.

(6)

The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of
Sessions Court without a prior order from it.

The petitioner shall co-operate and assist the
indulging in

Investigating Agency without

tampering the prosecution witnesses.

fl\\,:\.;\.