INTHEPHGHCOURTOFKARNATAKAATBANGALQRES
DATED TI-IIS THE I3" DAY OE OCTOBER, 2:309' ;V---[: f
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I-LN.I'NAGP.}§1OIr{AN:'DZXS:'-I.,,.A
WRIT PETITION No. B13525/2609'(LB-RESIRTT
BETWEEN:
Srnt. ZAINAB B1 V
W/O. TBRAI-IIM KHATIB
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS V I A A
R/P BHADRAPUR (l>IOUSE~'IV"G;76) "
PALA POST, MUNDQ()D TQ.,g 'A
U.K DIST. = ~ ~ I PETITIONER
(By Sri. I{_ALEEMULL-AH .SB.ARIE'E§ ADV.)
.I.$,¥.>T_..Q . I "
1. ZILLAPANCHAYAT
IITTARA KANNg_3ID,A DIST.
- I "KAR."'$/AR
» ~ REB, BY.ITS._CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
2. THE TA:L.UT< PANCHAYAT
'--~MUNDGC)D
UTTARA KANNADA DIST
MUNDGOD
L' V» B..Y ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER
P,__,.._/'3
Q»,
3. THE GRAMA PANCHAYAT
KODAE1 VILLAGE
MUNDGOD TQ.,
U.K DIST.
REP. BY ITS ADHYAKSHAI
SECRETARY. RE'S4PONDENT'S<__ ' -
(RI TO 3 SD.)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS PILED.'UNVDER'ARVTIcIi2ES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION. j4OP-..AINDIA"' WITH A
PRAYER TO QUASH THE"'IMPU--G1\€.ED "ORDER OE THE 3RD
RESPONDENT AT ANNEX-J DT. t5;5:20_o9 "As, _IIi..LEGAL AND
ONE WITHOUT JURISDICTION BYf..ISSUIE$3G A WRIT OE
CERTIORARI AND-ET’c. ” ‘ ‘
THIS COMING ON EOR
PRELIMINARY HExXR}NG.._B ._GROLfPVV_THIS DAY, THE COURT
PASSED TEE F’O;|;.rLOV’é!4IN(3′;’«…_
Petitioner A the .I–reSi’deIit of Bhadrapur viilage of Mudgod
Vitaiuk,”i–rIC’U’ttara”I*}s§annETiéi2’diSirict. The third respondent by collecting
oe,pOS;i.tVOf,::RS0.500!¢i_ifrom the petitioner as per Annexure B gave
water’-…cOnRectioi1Ai0 to her house On 03.02.2004. Thereafter the
“”Z-:i.”V’A”.__oetitiOnerz the benefit Of essentiai suppiy Of water till the
disconnection came to be made on 05.05.2009 as per
‘Annexure J. The reaSOning given by third respondent in Annexure .1
WWW
.iiy’V§;Rsr14o1io2oo9
that there is increase in population of the village and thereforefimater
supply to the petitioner’s house is disconnected, is unreasionabl’eV:’a.ndi–, _
unacceptable. If there is shortage of watermin the_v’i’iia~§,}ew»th’eVn the
same is to be regulated but the third respondent.jcarinot.di’scor§:nect::;_t
the water supply totally to the house«-of the’petitioners”Fii1’th.eVr shed
impugned order passed by the third respc.nde.nt as per Annevztiure J is
without notice to the petitione.ri7an_d’–_as %.such”‘«th’eA:s’ame is opposed to
the principles of natural justice’; — if V
2. For the reas’o’;;f..s;. stated aboire, ‘the_Vfol.ic–witng;
I. 00 Writ petivtionis .hei=ehyl.allowed.
II, , The i.rVnpusgned’-order at Annexure I dated 05.05.2009
passed hy’the–«third respondent is hereby quashed.
A :11. .0 v.f[11e:”third respondent is at liberty to pass appropriate
1 accordance with law after providing an
.~ opportunity to the petitioner.
sa/-=
gripes