Sultan Mohamood vs The State Of Karnataka on 23 June, 2009

IN THE HIGH comm' or KARNATAKA,  L'  %

mrrzn THIS Tim zsrw DAY or         

BEFORE 

THE 3:o1~rI3LE MR. msrrca 1zAm: n&oHA_::% V

wnrr rmmon NO. 17391kk:%§_z'k2oO7 

BETWEEN:

SULTAN MOHAMOOD   V
s/0 GHOUSE MQ_H'Il)9E.§JN _  
AGEDABOUTSE:    
CHAIRMAN *   -  ..   .

TUMKUH' i}'1é13A§§'. 9.é§3ELbR§dEN1§'"'AUTHOR1TY
TUMKUR, BEmUN;BA*RoA_D~---__ - -
TU-MKUR msfr.    . ...PETITIONER

(By Szi; PRA BHU'LING K--._fiAVADGI, ADV.)

        

 SFFATE  i{A.RNATA:<A

  V1KA:3__SQ{.1D_HA, BANGALORE ---1.

"  ("By smfi;-1_s& C NAGASHREE, AGA)

Rs;p..*;3Y ITS.SE{C2RETARY
SEP'i'.*OF' URBAN DEVELOPMENT

... RESPONDENT

T ” ” –._’I’}iIS WRIT PETiTION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
227 OF THE CONSTETUTION OF’ INDIA PRAYING TO
V ,QUASH THE IMPUGNEB COMMUHICATION VIDE ANNEXA.
” 29.1€).2()0′? ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT.

THIS PETFFION, COMING ON FOR PRLHEARING
IN ‘E’ GROUP, THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING I M