High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Prem Prakash Gupta vs State Of Bihar on 29 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Prem Prakash Gupta vs State Of Bihar on 29 July, 2010
          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Cr.Misc. No.18845 of 2010
            PREM PRAKASH GUPTA, S/o Laxaman Prasad.
                              Versus
                       THE STATE OF BIHAR
                             -----------

04. 29.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offences under Sections 302 and 120B of the

Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is

named in the First Information Report as a witness

who had seen the co-accused Thela Pasi firing at the

deceased Chandrashekar. Thereafter the petitioner

was implicated in the present case speculating that

he had a conspired with the co-accused Thela Pasi

since he also has criminal antecedent.

Considering that there is no eye-witness to

the occurrence and there is only suspicion against

the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of Additional

Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-IV, Saran at Chapra in
2

connection with S.Tr. No. 84 of 2010 arising out of

Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 290 of 2009 subject to

the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors

will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give

an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related

with the petitioner and the other bailor shall be the

brother of the petitioner. The bailor will also

undertake to inform the Court if there is any change

in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor

shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the

court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any

other case of similar nature after his release in the

present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of

bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner

will give an undertaking that he will receive the police

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed

for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates

and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date

and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled.

3

In view of the antecedents of the petitioner,

the petitioner is directed to appear before the Supdt.

of Police, Saran at Chapra within fifteen days of his

release with a copy of this order and thereafter every

two weeks for the next nine months. The conduct of

the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period

by the S.P. concerned and if it is found wanting in any

respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned

by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail

for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the

Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by

the petitioner before the court concerned.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-