Judgements Sophisticated Marble And Granite … vs Commissioner Of Customs on 18 December, 2003 December 18, 2003 / June 3, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal – Mumbai Sophisticated Marble And Granite … vs Commissioner Of Customs on 18 December, 2003 Equivalent citations: 2004 (165) ELT 353 Tri Mumbai Bench: J Balasundaram, S T S. ORDER Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J) 1. After hearing both sides for sometime on the application for stay of operation of the […] Read more »
Central Information Commission Judgements Shri N.K. Agarwal vs Geological Survey Of India on 24 November, 2009 November 24, 2009 / June 3, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Central Information Commission Shri N.K. Agarwal vs Geological Survey Of India on 24 November, 2009 Central Information Commission 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066 Website: www.cic.gov.in Decision No. 4725/IC(A)/2009 F. No.CIC/OP/A/2009/000277 Dated, the 24th November, 2009 Name of the Appellant : Shri N.K. Agarwal Name of the Public […] Read more »
Judgements Presentation Of The 132Nd, 133Rd And 134Th Reports Of The Standing … on 17 April, 2008 April 17, 2008 / June 3, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Lok Sabha Debates Presentation Of The 132Nd, 133Rd And 134Th Reports Of The Standing … on 17 April, 2008 p> Title: Presentation of the 132nd, 133rd and 134th Reports of the Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture on the Indian Maritime University Bill, 2007; the Airport Economic Regulatory Authority of India Bill, 2007; and […] Read more »
Judgements Alfa Traders vs The Commissioner Of Customs on 13 June, 2007 June 13, 2007 / June 3, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal – Bangalore Alfa Traders vs The Commissioner Of Customs on 13 June, 2007 Equivalent citations: 2007 (122) ECC 330, 2007 (148) ECR 330 Tri Bangalore, 2007 (217) ELT 437 Tri Bang Bench: S Peeran, J T T.K. ORDER T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) 1. This appeal has been filed against the […] Read more »
Central Information Commission Judgements Mr.K Vijayakumar vs Indian Overseas Bank on 15 November, 2011 November 15, 2011 / June 2, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Central Information Commission Mr.K Vijayakumar vs Indian Overseas Bank on 15 November, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002149/15682 Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002149 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. K. Vijayakumar Indian overseas bank Kodungallur, Thrissur District, Kerala state- […] Read more »
Central Information Commission Judgements Mr.Ravi Sharma vs Insurance Division on 12 October, 2010 October 12, 2010 / June 2, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Central Information Commission Mr.Ravi Sharma vs Insurance Division on 12 October, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Room No.296, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066 Telefax:011-26180532 & 011-26107254 website:cic.gov.in Complaint: No. CIC/DS/C/2010/000111 Dated:-12/10/2010 Complainant : Shri R K Sharma, Panipat Public Authority : National Insurance Co. Ltd, Chandigarh ORDER The Commission […] Read more »
Central Information Commission Judgements Shri Balkrishan Wadhwa vs Fci, Chandigarh on 19 January, 2010 January 19, 2010 / June 2, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Central Information Commission Shri Balkrishan Wadhwa vs Fci, Chandigarh on 19 January, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION (Hearing at UT Chandigarh) File No. CIC/LS/C/2009/000232 Appellant : Shri Balkrishan Wadhwa Public Authority : FCI, Chandigarh (through Shri S.P. Singh, AGM, Chandigarh & Shri Subhash Chander Sharma, Manager (Admn), Patiala) Date of Hearing : 19.1.2010 Date of Decision […] Read more »
Judgements Chittalur Pedda Venkata Subbaiah … vs Income-Tax Officer on 4 September, 1981 September 4, 1981 / June 2, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Income Tax Appellate Tribunal – Hyderabad Chittalur Pedda Venkata Subbaiah … vs Income-Tax Officer on 4 September, 1981 Equivalent citations: 1982 2 ITD 67 Hyd Bench: V Rajagopalan, T N Chandran ORDER V. Rajagopalan, Judicial Member 1. This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissing the appeal preferred […] Read more »
Judgements Cce vs Srf Ltd. on 4 April, 2002 April 4, 2002 / June 2, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal – Tamil Nadu Cce vs Srf Ltd. on 4 April, 2002 Equivalent citations: 2002 (104) ECR 94 Tri Chennai Bench: S Peeran ORDER S.L. Peeran, Member (J) 1. This Revenue appeal arises from order in Appeal No. 36/99 dt. 11.3.1999 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) allowing the Modvat credit on […] Read more »
Central Information Commission Judgements Mr.Arun G Nerkar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 25 October, 2010 October 25, 2010 / June 2, 2018 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment Central Information Commission Mr.Arun G Nerkar vs United Commercial Bank (Uco) on 25 October, 2010 Central Information Commission Complaint No.CIC/SM/C/2009/001045 Right to Information Act2005Under Section (18) Dated: 25 October 2010 Name of the Complainant u: Shri Arun G Nerkar Indian Mutual Fund Building, Second Floor, Mount Road, Extension, Sadar Nagpur. Name of the Public Authority : CPIO, UCO Bank, Zonal Office, 3rd Floor, Jaika Motors Building, Commercial Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur - 440 001. The Complainant was not present in spite of notice. On behalf of the Respondent, Shri P.K. Gupta was present. 2. In our order dated 1 February 2010, we had directed the CPIO not only to provide the desired information by 25 February 2010 but also to explain why the maximum penalty of Rs.25,000/ should not be imposed on him for not providing the information at all. Although the CPIO had written to us on 18 March 2010 informing us that some information was sent to the Complainant on 12 September 2009, we had fixed this case to hear the CPIO on his explanation for not providing the information in time. 3. During the hearing, the Respondent […] Read more »