Commissioner Of Income Tax vs S.S. Loomba on 4 July, 2002

0
136
Rajasthan High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs S.S. Loomba on 4 July, 2002
Equivalent citations: (2003) 185 CTR Raj 536
Bench: Y Meena, S K Sharma


JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Considering the submissions, the appeal is admitted in terms of the following questions :

“Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Tribunal was justified in deleting the additions made by the AO under the various heads namely, household expenses, unexplained investment in shares, loan, bank deposits, undisclosed investment in plot and unexplained investment in shares on protective basis and understatement of capital gains on sale of plot in view of the provisions of Chapter XIV-B of the IT Act ?”

“Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, in view of the provisions of Section 158BB(2) of the IT Act, which make the legal fiction enacted under Sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B and 69C, the additions made by the AO could be deleted ?” .

2. Issue notice to the other side. Notices be made returnable within six weeks. Paper book be filed within 4 months. List the appeal for hearing after 4 months.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *