Loading...

Eshwara S/O Lakkappa vs The Chairman Kptcl on 17 June, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Eshwara S/O Lakkappa vs The Chairman Kptcl on 17 June, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
1:»: THE §-IIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALf§ )'RE

DATED THIS THE um: my OF' JUNE wzé % 

BEFORE

mm HOPPBLE MR. JUSTICE; gI. C}Ui§I'J;§L..  '  

WRIT PETITION NO.1.6315/':2¢O8(GI§*f'-Effijfi)
BETWEEN:   L    

1. I-3.)ShWara,
Son of Lakkappa, V V ~ 
Aged about 38--years,'"  -  " 
Orzo: Agzicz:;ii'L?:r§:f.'  '  " ' ____ H
2. M.C.Mar:jeg;5*fizda;'*-- »  '
Son Qf.Lakké;p;:;;1,V_ .. _
Aged abo'L1tf36 yvé:a1's,"«..é_' _
Occ:i.Ps$'i"(:1_11ti1fC», A   * '

3. BasaVe5gegx?d.a,VV   
SonLak1:appa, '
Ag*:d about 34kyearrs,

,  _ _<j')?::c: 'figficglture.

 Eétisiaiicgoavéétzi',

'Sén of Léikkappa,
Aged 'smut 32 years,
QCC: Agriculture.

 "  resident of

A'  _ Chanflapama viiiage,
ififififififi Taluk,

 A -'fiassazi District. ...PE'}'i'FIONERS

(By Sri.K.§.L9k.nath, Adv.)



AND:

1. 'i'he Chairman,
KPTCL, Cauvcry Bhavan,
Bangalore ~--~ 560 009.

2. The Superintendent E1*1gineer,I_  A 1
K.P.T.C.L., Shankanpura Read",  '
Hassan.    '

3. The Executive Engineer,  
KPFCL, Chamundeshwam _.... _  
Electnclty 'I'ransm1s$7i'-an Ltd, , V ' " ._ v " « ,
Shankari Mutt Raga; "  *      
Hassan. V   '

Chamuilgicfihvir-:»sIfi P'€XW.§:I"'~~. V
Transm1'-331011;L1m'iteaci';..  ' '
I~Ia5:s«az1. " Y -- 

4. The Ass1sta:iffF;>:ec2it11fe  * 

(By SI'i.N'.K.§  R1 to R3)

  This sifiit "petition is filed under Articles 226 and
22?' {if the Q6ns4;§:L:fion of India with a prayer to direct
the'  ta " ti;-xzonsiéier the represeniatitm dated
12.1 1';2{3G8, :1;.:4:6.c?by the petitioners in respect of fixing

 électric "pole:-3 'i:r;?tI1e Land of the petitioners to draw a
Heavy Teixsian Wine in Land Sy.No.-48/10, 48/11,
:3i:"¢::.fc2;:;~::,1Ifi3:1g '-3.'? 1/1 Situated at Chalmapama village,

g   «: ~-33553:: Taluk, Hassazi Bistrict is marked as Annexuré

 _    wrii petitioll earning on for preliminwy
 in 'B' Group, this day, the Cour: made the
" « . Vfoiiewing: '

...}?3ESPONDEN'PS



OREER

The case of the petitiorzers is that their faézher

purchased the lands in Sy.N0.48/13 

measuring 17 guntas of land in Channalqeixiav 

Hessan '}'a1uk, Hassan Distxietfhi    

purchased in the year 2003. _4 Af£iei%f_ithe deem ioi' 

father, the petitioners have 2 he fiijopertgz.
Copy of the Revenue Reeercie   V..t;§ii'1i1eXLH'e 425;'. The
claim of the petitieiiereviis   land was

purchased,  "Elie Natiena} High Way
for openixig   "the said land and have

coI'ietri_:ete'ci~--.  investing a huge amount.

 v i_The._'§'eepe11n3entAieezzaizieteei a survey and marked the line

 High Tension Wire {rem KEB

to.'  Aiiviilk Federation. The respondents have

ii’.,.,_i<1;:1ade eveketch by the side of the petitioners' land. The

ef the petitioners is that there is aiready 3 Tower

ieeizsieting of six: lines vsiih provision fer another tweive

e faeeieonai lines. The further case of the geeeoner is

that on the adjeiifiing land of the petitioners a new iine

was sought to be drawxa and it was marked. 11; is
further case that three towers were ereetedi.'
however, without any justifiable reason, "
tewers have been removed and xuemt beiee'
the Land of the petitioners.

éirectien to the reepoedetite to— the V
representation dated . of
eleetsrie poies in the also for a
dixeetion for sees;;a:1d¢}1;s: %:{ttt~:o’-/{itemégproceed with the
work 0;’ in the sanixe.

counsel appearing for

the ;pe1:i3:ioI”ie1fiA s’ubIriiteT that when the Towers were

~__the Vvttefijeirfiug iancl belonging to the

“‘}gettitie11e1=3} .there was :10 justiflabie reason for the

responrfiexzte for changing the said land and shifting the

t V ‘i;n’+v_e1’e{

3. Mr.N.§~”;.Gupta, learned counsel appearing for

respondents 1 ta 3, en the basis of the statement at’

-5-

erected in the iazzd of the petitioners and fines Iggave
been drawn. He submits that the erltire 17 A’
the petitioners’ land is not made use of, .

oniy two legs of the Towers V
petitioners and the remaining
cofiédor of the National
that the better part of Stijfl éffaiiablaj to the
petitioners. A’ ‘ 4_ _

4. A§§a§fiflfi3g_, from the
eariier it appears a
fiefifioners on 12.11.2008

Witfi It-:gafd–.. to Vf13¢VA’f1X.a;fion of the tower. Both the

v ._CGur1i§:31E:’;1§:e fiat ifia..;:1s3siti0n E0 submit that whether the

V’-.Ap1#cg’§”actt; ivs:’c§m’a;:issio11ed irzasmuch as the transmission

of _.<fil1pply is commenced. Be that as it may,

"the fasfremains that a represerztation is given on

H;_2GO8 for shiftingnthe towers and in all fairness,

respondents ought to have repiieci to the said

f'rapresez1ta¥:ior1. It appears that has :10: bean done.

Consequentiy, fbI1owi3:1g order is passed: M
5

-5 –

Petition stands disposed of éirecting the

respondents to consider the represemation gven

petitioners. If the representatioza is not givg:ti”‘§oj_~ _

respondents that shall be done within a p::3:it5§’§.. df.::bu1′ ”

weeks from today and the resp0r1§ents«A.i:1ié:f€§§af’Eef”shQ_i

consider the same in accorciémce with IaW’ :’W5ii”l’}.iI},

outer limit of two months from___f:I”1*: (iate of of the
said I’€pI’BS€I’i¥Ca1Ii0I”i.

Petition stajidys V

eonsidefafliesn. VV”M§sC.W.5424/2009 stands
disposed of]. . ” Sal’

Z _____ .. « ‘judge

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information