IN THE HIGH COURT OF
BAEYGALORE
DATED THIS THE 14″‘ DAY 01? _zx1r(:I,%~.3:’r2g;a”9 { Q
armour;
THE HONBLE MR.JUS’f»i(_-TE Hi?I§’¥’Al}i;”(j,:§§g§hri_}?$SHV f %
wan’ P1~:T1’1’10N N().s7′{ 3906
;tw_:.__s” hm.
W.P.N(}.877/06:
B}:Z’I’WEEN::_” % {,3
21591 01;
Karnamka§Smia Rné3 ‘ ‘
Transport’ £?[;jtp0rét§$n, — _
Central C3ffi¢e.§; __ — ‘
Shantfiinagar; .
Bangaiare-456002?_; _ ” 4′
By its Man’aginfigV Dércctafg’ ”
New represented.b};’ its
. – ‘C1″§;–iéf ¥;aw”V’Qff1ccr.V H “”” ”
Acha)
AND; % X
” V n \”%._}n,.R’amash3
v .S;’C¥:_N.M,Lakshmaiah Shetty’,
A Agéd about 36 years,
V% 2 __N0.52, 2″‘: Crfisa 2″‘! Main,
Vivekananda Calmiy,
Near Banashanlstari Temple,
Kanakapiara Main Rm; ,
..PETITIONER
Bangaiore-560078. ..RF;SPONDENT.
(By Sri.S.B.I\/Iiikkasznappa, Adv.)
This Writ Petition} is flied under Arficzgg 2:z6:;g::d 221*; nf
the Constitution of India praying ta €512.35}; the aiiiafd d’t..1_’_7.5′;{)5V’ ‘ .
made in I.D.No.93..f98 by the District »and_; S¢;s;é;i;)23.:;”.¥?:;dgé..:Aan.c§ ‘
Presiciing Officer, Principal I..ab<iur 'Céxurt, ¥3angzrj<ir¢«._.:#i:i.¢
AnneX,F.
W.P.N().21 591.305:
BETW’_EE.:’é :
V.L.Ranr:€:sh, V’
s:o.N.M.Laksh:.:;a;aan $en;s, ”
Aged abo§;’t’«’13’___\;’éarf?-.. ” A
a ‘-
No.52, 2*’ §lrs:%:_sV.<§2""' {'v1aii¥i;_- &
Viv6i:anaz;déi5§I0_iaifiy, _ _
Near Bafiashankajfé __
K:–.1z3aka1p_ui'a% Main f3{1a,d;.,,,_ ' ' "
BangaiQre%=§6G078–_. A " " ..PETITIONER
V' _, Sfiw;S-B.}\4zA1V§§fika3H1'appa, Adv.)
AA ' ,§=.'.*, .
L ,.
A’F§¥e Ccxztrolier,
Kazfgaaiaka State Ruad
AA Transgbrt Cczrporation,
T V Bangalore Raga} Division,
_ V Subhashnagar,
Banga10re–560009. ..RESP()NBE-NT
(By Sri-i4,.(}0viVI:d/raj? Adv.)
This Writ Petition is filed under Artistes 226 and 227 at
the Constitution of India. prayizzg to quash the finpugngd award
dt.}7.5.05 by the Fri. Labour Court, Bangalore in I.D;N’o.93.!98
vide Ann-A in so far as it reiates tn the dezziai wages
and other consmquential benefits? under the» . .fif’a.gté’ _._ a~:1d
circumstances ofthc case. ” ‘V
Theme Writ Pctiticms comiztg 0:1 dr(tet§”’tI5i’é::”d_a§;the .
Court made the foliowingz
oantxt
«unnu-.-_.u~.._-_–..>–a—-
In these two ;3§tit.i.(;:2:s:Vt};§”‘?t1I;::tétg;:rI1cntAAa:;§ we}! as the
workman are a._ssaiiing.. the Prl. I,ab:~sur
Cour; Bafigggmmt%tntI.t§§Ng.93z93 dated 23.5.05.
tA_}}e:.giV§§g_ ttiégtt :t_t.i’sc:f;:”:(iizct ef pmducing fake medical
.V%_re§:n{§izr.<:-mztent for uniawfut gain an enquiry was
V §ih'sti'iut%.é<i..':1g;ai';–1"3t the w0rk.trsan who was warkiing as an Artisan
'ezfiéarvthét{T.dt;~a0ratit3n ané after enquiry, he was dismissad from
A sert3ic§t:'<311 23,598,, .aga£;;st vahich, wurkman raimci a eiisputa
Sectican §0(-4–~A} {1f the I.¥,).Act bcfsra tits Pri. Labour
Ccurt, Bangalmc. The iabour Ctaurt by order éated }.7,5-G5
w§1i¥e setting aside the order of dismissaf has 0:*dt:'"ra7d far
reinstatemetzt to his ariginal past with mntinttity Exit
withmzi: back wages. Being aggrieved by the tyiifiiifixlifii'
back wages the workman is béfare:-..tf;§s ~C€;:jr%- 4a:idLA__v§»3i[fig
aggrieved by the order of :gai::_$t&téin~£:iii theV VM]§:2agett:§;envf
before this Cmrrt.
3. Heard-__ ..
%ifi3;*ar§i ofthe ¥ab0ur Court is that
the wfaykmafi h;;S’VA;E§e§§r1–~._.f§iia<},I1itted in the criznirzai case: due ta
inS1{.f,5Qicnf'infi:est§'gaii{;z§:.It has alga observed that the (mmers
. ., 4§;v'f"'tAf§e2"'§1:'1:'*»€:§icg'_=..t} sht§ ;'i§&}&2ave appeared befbm the Court and stated
by the wmicman do But beirmg in them
afié it has denied to award back wages while awarding
" ., " rVt:é;;st2ii:eme:;t with continuity ofsttrvice. Afie: {einstatement ihe
w<:3rk¥¥:a:z saié tn haw Wfifkfid far two years. Now he Wants 13:}
resign far the jab- However, in the izzierest of jzistice, whiic
maintaining this Qrdar crf labmzr Crmrt in granting snniinuity of
W
service it wauld be zippmpriate R) extend the benefit sf
consizqizexxtiai benefits since the mbour C01_1.rt_ 'fiat
specificaliy denied the cnnscquential bc11ei§ts.V'§§$"'ti%:;c:' V'
but 'W§th€)i.i{ back wages.
5. With thf: above 0bse:*s*2{€*i:i§1s_; flied by the
workman as well as by; thézt M&nag§’::.11’é’:i§vv~:§fedisposed sf.
L IUDGE