N.R.Dave vs The Commissioner on 16 December, 2006

0
83
Madras High Court
N.R.Dave vs The Commissioner on 16 December, 2006
       

  

  

 
 
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 16.12.2006

Coram

The Honourable Mr. Justice P.SATHASIVAM
and
The Honourable Mr. Justice S.TAMILVANAN

Writ Petition No.48960 of 2006
and
MP. No.1 of 2006


++++++++

N.R.Dave				..Petitioner 


	Vs.


1. The Commissioner,
   Corporation of Chennai,
   Chennai.

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer,
   Corporation of Chennai,
   Zone V, Division 64,
   Chennai 600 003.			..Respondents

++++++++


	Writ Petition   filed  under Article 226 of the Constitution of India  for issuance of a writ of    Certiorari to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the first respondent dated 30.11.2006 and  quash the same. 


For Petitioner   :  Mr.R.Saravanakumar

For  Respondents :  Mr.V.Bharathidasan
    						
	
ORDER

(Order of the Court was delivered by P. SATHASIVAM, J.)

Aggrieved by the proceedings of the first respondent viz., the Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, dated 30.11.2006, the petitioner has filed the above writ petition to quash the same.

2. On direction Mr.V.Bharathidasan takes notice for the respondents.

3.The only grievance of the petitioner is that against the proceedings of the first respondent, appeal lies to Standing Committee, Corporation of Chennai under Section 366 of Chennai City Municipal Corporation Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). According to the petitioner, on receipt of the earlier order issued under Section 256(3) of the said Act, he preferred an appeal to the Standing Committee, Corporation of Chennai, on 12.12.2006. It is the grievance of the petitioner that till the said appeal is disposed of by the authority concerned, the respondents are not permitted to take further action. He also brought to our notice that the appeal papers were received by the Standing Committee, Corporation of Chennai on 12.12.2006.

4. In view of the above factual information and of the fact that the petitioner has already availed the appeal remedy under Section 366 of the Act, we are of the view that ends of justice would be met by directing the Standing Committee, Corporation of Chennai, to consider and dispose of the appeal of the petitioner dated 12.12.2006, in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such final decision is taken by the Standing Committee, the impugned proceedings of the first respondent dated 30.11.2006 is suspended.

5. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2006 is closed.

raa

To

1. The Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai,
Chennai.

2. The Assistant Executive Engineer,
Corporation of Chennai,
Zone V, Division 64,
Chennai 600 003.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *