ORDER This petition is filed under Section 482_f'of of Criminal Procedure seeking' to q_u'ash:'_eVthe *ent_i're" . proceedings on the file of the Bagalakot in cr.Misc.No.35/2.009.'-V. . 2. I have heard for the petitioner. it is counsel that 11/8. 12 of t_he"'Velric1es Taxation Act. 1957, the of the vehicle is liable' to the Financier has taken possessiojnoplf the proceedings against the p€.3'£_§¥;.'ti'V()1"\1(2r are not sustainable. V'is:_i..further contended that the respondent
oughtv_.to:violloW the procedure contemplated under the
ppprovisiotns of the Code and directly filing the charge
‘ gs3e.eet is impermissible.
i
4. The learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of
the offence alleged and the proceeding is pending for
adjudication before the Magistrate. The o1’de’r.”p:’sliVeet
discloses that the respondent has not
the proceedings properly sinceA”‘ti1eg_year«l”fine ti’
proceedings cannot be quashed.__oi’.dinarilygttnlesslit ‘is.
shown to the court pri1na.–_fa’eie, llllithere are’
absolutely no grounds.. to thelcase and it is
not likely that the petitiovrlerllcvot.-d¢1’~convicted on the
pieaded case.”:..:.1.’Fhis_ cocild'”he’:«’d’eci.ded only after full
dressed triallloypg -le’aifne_d_- Magistrate. The provisions
says that’ owner or the person in
possession of th’e’lveliicle, is«1iable to pay the tax. Under
the cifeninstances, there are no grounds to quash the
A pi*oceedi1_1g_s~lV.as”‘sought for by the petitioner.
Petition is hereby rejected.
Sd/-w
JUDGE
V’ mi
