" : f4.';cms'.:itr.:§:io:1"c3fIndia praying to dimct the R1 to 53311:: the hall !ickét.Vto petitioner for the examination commcncing on 31.112-%e:}7. VT petition coming' on for Orders, this day, the Court "--.. m,a;d¢tl:m-tbkwing: 20697.07' il'fllEI-iIG!'IO0fiR.'1'O§'KkRlA'.l'AKAA.Tl DA'PEB'l'H!BTI-I324-"*DAYOFJUH3,2008 BE? THE HOWBLE MR. JU3'!'I% B.S.l'A'l'II; BETWEEH: Sandeep Singh, S/0 Satyanarayana Singh, Aged about 18 years, Resident ofJaya11@9*** Block, Twit Bund Road, my ulmmuum aj,-A kk 1. The " Vishvcshwai:s:ya_fl'echxn;§kpgn2-,ai_-- University, Bangalore Institute oi'-'!'cchnologz, K..RgRoa3, v.v.i>1n§gg;,, an fin: 8.93111 and Anti, tor R-1; It/.a,_s.x.r.§gaf:r;¢y as Ants, Adv Eat my 'm filed under Articles 226 85 227 of the " W as Schedubd Cash: ofdifiemnt sum. 2 wp20697.07 $3 1. The pctifimncr has appxwhcd this Court seeking a direction to the 1-: respondent ---- University to
ticket to him for the n m on _
2. It is his case that he bc1o:;gg fa
category and is entitled for being 1′
secured the Iequisitc P.U.C.
ex:am:m.a.’ tion. He 93; P.U.C.
.lgtion for being
eligible of Engineexing course.
He been duly admitted’ to the
course for he was required to take
” Scmcstgcf commencing fmm 31.12.2007.
permitted an take the ‘ ‘ , he
Court seeking a direction to issue the hall
_tiackct”‘i<J the examizuation eommnncing on 31.12.2007.
' « «1¢uis $':1ot in dispum that the petitioner claims the benefit
% in the percentage of marks in the
T examination namely H P.U.C. on the gmund that he
3 wp20697.0? T
4. A qucsfion Whether’ a camifiate who is regarded as
Schedu1edCmtcandSchedu}edTribcina:n;othcrStateam1
who chims that privileges given fiat Scheduicd and
Scheduled Tribes in the State of Karnataka in
adnnss’ ion to the B.E. courses a per the mlevax-_
flamed by the mspondcnt-University =
L-t–‘b5¢tL3-i{~ZLO’:_.xu¢1,_4¢A.¢fi:’}’ 9 .y _ «_ V A
admissions’ fie}! £31″ consideration ;_a
connected Wxil: Petition No.83/2oos.”‘+._mer
candida” ice from” to chim the
privikge and Schedubd ‘l’ribc
of the the said candid’ ate
bclongeq-L1″.étc_§ in the Star: of his
ongm’ ‘ as or Scheduled Trme. This
«. fig following the t of the
11 of fly Apex Court in Int?! Guuulra
9…’. W m. sea: “mm .-…u.,. ….
3 see page zaapami Action. Comnflttue on
cast; cerumeaee to sdudulcd cam and
Tribes in an mm af an Ant.
T ‘®unun cflndia an Ant. (An: 1994 sew 33053.
4 wp2069’7.07 ”
5. Th1:£acts£nthismscanadthemliefsoughtaresin1i}arto
e/ICQQL
the one invoizmi in wars Petfiion No.83/zoos. &’i’his writ
mfimnEabo . Hmem,wh%d tmmfl
writ petition this Court has issued certain directions
of the $55 oollmted towards the candid;-1te’s _
hostel charges, examination fees, etc. In
directions issued in the connected i
charges collected frgxn 3:’ am ,F_., ~ tuiiiion fee,
today. The student the original
‘by«’._iV1′;V”V’V:Pct’rtion¢:r is also held
entitled ‘ Sam the respondent.
College in a sum of R:-3e_.5;000/– as 1%spondc:1t–CoBcgc lms
” _t<_$_V't§s;;-_–sijJ;ig:;1_t_wi:thout verifying his efigibility
the matter to the University though such
aa'a,a.m1sm'* ' WW3' flak smaw.
Sd/-
Judge
