affected the fam:x<:J:°s at large. The axmst Qf petitioner'
necessaxy for custodiai intfirrogation.
5. 1 have berm taken, ihrozlgh the cnmplaiut Z
mahazar.
6. At this $tage, them is §I’i£:;1a,f._21cic iilafizxial to»’.sh5»;5w ‘
petitioner was howflixig 200 bags DA?
pfllmit/1iC€flSC. After saiziijic of SAP,
petitioner had not given, $33? ¢:2.5(pi;e1i1a§x*:«f that he was homfimg the
aforesaid cf: due license] permit. The
alkzged Gffftflfié is a,n’e(ion<§m:i(: offense. There is ac: material
* 5:i -mcbfiii f§*sh{3w thafvfiéiivfionar has been faiseiy ijinpliicaizeé.
=t_h:: 1:a:i_§1re of OfififiCfi afiageé againsi petitioner;
custoéiffil m&'£:d§afion cangaat he denied. In the
-. : -‘4.{:_i1¥3I1m@Sta?31§;é;s; 2 do no: fmé any mamas to ergtertain the
V’ «.p€¥.{££;i::;_nf”_«
K Accordingly, petitzfon is rejected.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Bkm,