Posted On by &filed under Top Law News.

A scientist-cum-textile engineer has been acquitted by a court here of the charge of accepting bribe for clearing a sample of electrical cables relating to Indo-Pak border lightning project.

Special Judge Pradeep Chaddah said the CBI case does not “generate confidence” as the “holes in the evidence are too big and unbridgeable” to prove the charges of accepting a bribe of Rs 5,000 against Avinash Kumar, a scientist and Textile Engineer at the National Test House at Ghaziabad.

“The holes in the evidence are too big and unbridgeable… The story of the prosecution does not generate confidence. Accused was a qualified Textile Engineer and had apparently nothing to do with testing of electric cables.

“This leads me to hold that CBI has failed to prove its case under section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act beyond all shadows of doubt,” the judge said while acquitting Kumar.

According to the CBI, Kumar had allegedly demanded a sum of Rs 7,500 from the complainant R S Guleria in 1994 to give his approval to a sample of the electric cables belonging to a company which was being represented by the complainant’s firm.

During the trial, Guleria had told the court that an approval from National Test house was necessary to procure an order for an Indo-Pak border flood lightning project.

He had alleged that Kumar had agreed to accept Rs 5,000, after he had negotiated with him.

During the trial, CBI had claimed that it had caught the accused red handed while accepting the bribe from Guleria here on July 16, 1994.

Kumar had argued in the court that since he was a textile engineer he had nothing to do with the testing of electric cables and he had been falsely implicated in the case.

The court, however, acquitted Kumar by giving him the benefit of doubt after going through the evidence produced before it by the CBI.

One Response to “Court acquits scientist in graft case”

  1. V.S.Acharya

    I would like to have a copy of this full judgement in my mail box. This is a very important judgement and can be cited in a number of cases where CBI just for the sack of their targets misuses the law.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *