Posted On by &filed under High Profile Cases, Top Law News.

In a major reprieve for Bollywood superstar Salman Khan, the Bombay High Court today suspended the five-year sentence awarded to him in the 2002 hit-and-run case, admitted his appeal against conviction and granted bail to Salman .

Justice Abhay Thipsay directed Khan to surrender before the trial court forthwith and execute a fresh bail bond of Rs. 30,000. The interim bail granted to the actor hours after his conviction and sentencing on Wednesday was to expire today.

While admitting the 49-year-old actor’s appeal, the HC said it will expedite the hearing on it and posted the matter for June 15.

“This is not a case where I should keep him (Khan) in jail till his appeal is heard and decided. Why his right should suffer when his appeal is admitted and kept pending? In many cases people have suffered and spent their entire prison term only to be acquitted later by the High Court,” Justice Thipsay observed.

“The normal rule is that when an appeal is admitted and the sentence is under seven years, it (the sentence) is suspended. Why do you (prosecution) want to depart from this norm?” the court said.

Justice Thipsay noted that Khan has been on bail throughout the trial even after being slapped with the serious charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

“There are a number of arguable points raised about whether or not Khan was driving the car. It is also nobody’s case that Khan will abscond if he released on bail, pending appeal,” he said.

Justice Thipsay directed Khan to seek the court’s permission before travelling abroad.

Soon after the High Court’s order, a visibly relieved Salman, dressed in casuals and sporting sun glasses, left his Bandra residence for the sessions court in the Fort area of south Mumbai to execute the fresh bail bond.

Jubilant fans and well-wishers, who had gathered outside his residence since morning, erupted in joy when the news reached them.

One Response to “HC suspends and grants bail to Salman in hit-and-run case”

  1. DThorat

    If the unfortunate footpath sleeper were someone close to me, I would feel unhappy and dissatisfied with what the Hon`ble High Court did. The Hon`ble judge asked several questions to which perhaps appropriate and valid answers could be furnished. The entire history of so many years of the hearing of this particular case points out the glaring and serious finding that the accused was drunk, having no driving licence, his defence lawyer brought all sorts of excuses and pleas which can only be false and misleading the court. The accused himself has left no stone unturned to contact and meet high dignitaries. The hapless family members of the deceased was not given anything. If they were to be given at least about half the lawyers fees, and a sincere apology for the unfortunate accident, I feel certain that some consideration could have been given by the judiciary. That did not happen. Now, the case may go on for years and ultimately the accused may get scot free. Some where one does feel sorry. This an expression of feeling, not a contempt of court.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *