Pathankot: In hearing the gruesome rape and murder case of an eight-year-old girl, today district and sessions court asked the prosecution to share, a day in advance with defending lawyers, names of those witnesses who do not have any security threat, a lawyer said.
Pathankot District and Sessions Judge Tejwinder Singh, while hearing a petition of defence counsel for disclosure of names of witnesses in advance, left it to the prosecution to share the names of only such witnesses, a day in advance with defence lawyers, who do not have any security threat, said Special Public Prosecutor J K Chopra.
The court, while disposing off three applications of defence counsel, asked it would be appropriate to direct the prosecution to disclose the names of witnesses in advance a day before examination barring those who are under threat, Chopra said.
Defence counsel A K Swahaney told reporters that the court agreed with their plea for disclosure of witnesses names in advance.
The defence had last month moved the court with the plea saying that it would help them in preparing for their case.
The judge, however, took cognizance of the crime branch application in which they had pleaded that disclosing names in advance will have a bearing on their security, Chopra said.
However, it agreed that such names, who do not face any threat, will be shared in advance, he added.
The crime branch of the Jammu and Kashmir Police had highlighted that some vested groups in Hiranagar and Kathua area had launched a well-organised campaign against the investigating agency by large-scale propaganda on electronic, print and social media to “mislead the masses”.
The prosecution also brought to notice that a targeted campaign to intimidate witnesses had come to fore.
