Top Law News HC notice on St. Stephens principal’s appointment August 1, 2012 / August 1, 2012 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment A single judge order that upheld the appointment of Valson Thampu as the principal of St. Stephens college has been challenged in the the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued notices to Delhi University and St. Stephens College on the issue of appointment of Valson Thampu. A division bench of Acting […] Read more » A.K. Sikri AAU Acting Chief Justice A.K. Sikri Allahabad Agricultural University Delhi High Court Delhi University DU HC High Court High courts of india Justice Rajeev Sahai Endlaw Justice Siddharth Mridul principal of St. Stephens college Rajeev Sahai Endlaw St. Stephen's College St. Stephens St. Stephens principal St. Stephens principal's appointment Valson Thampu as the principal of St. Stephens college
Top Law News Karnataka High Court:Two day time given to appoint Lokayukta July 24, 2012 by Legal India Admin | Leave a Comment The Karnataka High Court gave two days’ time to Advocate-General S. Vijay Shankar to get instructions from the government in appointment of Lokayukta and also pointed out that “the Government is violating the Karnataka Lokayukta Act”. Observing that the “public is getting restless” because of the failure to appoint the Lokayukta for the past 10 […] Read more » appointment of Lokayukta Chief Justice Vikramajit Sen delay in appointment of karnataka Lokayukta delay in appointment of Lokayukta High Courts High courts of india Justice Aravind Kumar Karnataka Karnataka High Court Karnataka Lokayukta Karnataka Lokayukta Act Lokayukta Lokayukta Act Supreme Court violation of Karnataka Lokayukta Act
Top Law News Bombay High court: There is difference between impotency and infertility July 24, 2012 by Legal India Admin | 1 Comment on Bombay High court: There is difference between impotency and infertility Bombay High court observed that there is a marked difference between ‘infertility’ and ‘impotency’, and set aside a 1994 order of divorce. The family court, in October 1994, had granted divorce to the husband (then 42 years old) on the ground that the wife (then 45 years old) was impotent, a valid ground for divorce […] Read more » Bombay High Court difference between impotency and infertility High Court High courts of india impotency impotency as a ground of divorce impotency under Hindu marriage act infertility infertility is not impotency not bearing child is not impotency sec 12(1) of hindu marriage act sec 12(1) of HMA section 12(1) of Hindu marriage act Section 12(1) of HMA