Legal Articles This Is Nothing But A Direct Assault On Judiciary Itself July 30, 2021 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It must be stated right at the outset that the ghastly manner in which an upright, dedicated, determined and disciplined Judge named Uttam Anand who was an Additional District Judge (ADJ) posted in Dhanbad district of Jharkhand was mowed down by an autorickshaw has sent shivers down the spine. The ghastly incident happened on […] Read more » ADJ Uttam Anand ADJ Uttam Anand is brutally murdered in broad daylight Assault On Judiciary Itself CJI NV Ramana Jharkhand High Court Justice Dr DY Chandrachud Justice Hrishikesh Roy
Legal Articles Govt. Cannot Operate Like Limitation Does Not Apply To It: SC Imposes Costs On Officers Responsible For 462 Days Delay In SLP December 21, 2020 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It cannot be denied by anyone that government is the biggest litigator in courts and is responsible to a large extent for the huge pending cases in different states all across the country. The top court is definitely not happy with the state of […] Read more » Govt. Cannot Operate Like Limitation Does Not Apply To It Justice Dinesh Maheshwari Justice Hrishikesh Roy SC Imposes Costs On Officers Responsible For 462 Days Delay In SLP
Legal Articles Supreme Court Deprecates Practice Of Pronouncing Final Orders Without Reasoned Judgments December 21, 2020 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In a latest, learned, landmark and laudable judgment titled Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Zaixhu Xie & Ors. in Civil Appeal No. 4022/2020 in [SLP [C] No. 15137 2020] D. No. 21991/2020 delivered just recently on December 11, 2020 by a three Judge Bench of Supreme Court comprising of Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari […] Read more » Civil Appeal No. 4022/2020 Justice Dinesh Maheshwari Justice Hrishikesh Roy Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Zaixhu Xie & Ors. Supreme Court Deprecates Practice Of Pronouncing Final Orders
Legal Articles Executive Acting In Breach Of Judgments Would Be Invitation To Anarchy: Supreme Court December 14, 2020 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In a strong reprimand to Centre, the Supreme Court just recently on 7 December 2020 has in a latest, learned, laudable and landmark judgment titled KK Agarwal vs Sanjiv Nandan Sahai [CONMT.PET.(C) No. 429/2020 in C.A. No. 14697/2015] has led from the front in pulling up the Central Government for not appointing law member in […] Read more » Central Electricity Regulatory Commission CERC Executive Acting In Breach Of Judgments Would Be Invitation To Anarchy Justice Dinesh Maheshwari Justice Hrishikesh Roy KK Agarwal vs Sanjiv Nandan Sahai SC Supreme Court y Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Legal Articles Police Presence During Test Identification Makes Statements By Identifiers Fall Within The Ban Of Section 162 CrPC: SC November 2, 2020 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It must be stated right at the outset that in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Chunthuram vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Criminal Appeal No. 1392 of 2011 delivered as recently as on October 29, 2020, a three-Judge Bench of the Apex Court comprising of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Krishna Murari and Hrishikesh Roy […] Read more » Ban Of Section 162 CrPC Chunthuram vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Criminal Appeal No. 1392 of 2011 Justice Hrishikesh Roy Justice Krishna Murari Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul Police Presence During Test Identification
Legal Articles Related Witnesses Testimony, If Found Truthful, Can Be The Basis Of Conviction: SC October 12, 2020 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Karulal and others vs The State of Madhya Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No. 316 of 2011 delivered on 9 October 2020, a three Judge Bench of Apex Court comprising of Justice NV Ramana, Justice Surya Kant and Justice Hrishikesh Roy has observed in no uncertain terms that […] Read more » Basis Of Conviction Criminal Appeal No. 316 of 2011 Justice Hrishikesh Roy Justice NV Ramana Justice Surya Kant Karulal and others vs The State of Madhya Pradesh
