Posted On by &filed under High Court, Madras High Court.


Madras High Court
Adaikka Maistry vs Muthusami Ambalagaran And Ors. on 13 April, 1914
Equivalent citations: 25 Ind Cas 144
Bench: Wallis, Oldfield


JUDGMENT

1. The finding is that the widow has alienated the whole estate and that the next reversioner has consented to the alienation. The rule that the widow may alienate the whole estate with the consent of the next reversioner is not affected by the recent decision of the Calcutta Full Bench Debi Prosad Chowdhry v. Golap Bhagat 19 Ind. Cas. 273 : 17 C.W.N. 701 : 17 C.L.J. 499 : 40 C. 721, or by the recent decision of the Privy Council Bijoy Gopal Mukerji v. Girindra Nath Mukerji 23 Ind. Cas. 162 : 12 A.L.J. 711 : 19 C.L.J. 620 : 16 Bom. L.R. 425 : 16 M.L.T. 68 : 27 M.L.J. 123 : 1 W. 533 : 18 C.W.N. 673 (P.C.) which only deals with partial alienations. The decrees were right and the second appeals are dismissed with costs.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Loading Facebook Comments ...
Loading Disqus Comments ...