Legal Articles Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rejection Of Mercy Petition Palpably Illegal: Supreme Court May 6, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In a major and significant development, the Supreme Court just recently on April 24, 2019 in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Union of India and Ors. Vs. Dharam Pal in Criminal Appeal No. 804 of 2019 [@Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 498 of 2016] has clearly, categorically and convincingly observed that […] Read more » Rejection Of Mercy Petition Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict
Legal Articles Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPNDT Act, Complete Contents Of Form ‘F’ Mandatory May 6, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment To start with, the Supreme Court in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecological Societies of India (FOGSI) Vs. Union of India and others in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 129 of 2017 delivered on May 3, 2019 and authored by Justice Arun Mishra for himself and Justice Vineet Saran has […] Read more » obstetricians and gynaecologists purpose of the Act to prevent female foeticide and regulate the right to life of the girl child Section 23 Of PCPNDT Act
Legal Articles Witness Can Be Called Interested Only When He/She Derives Some Benefit Seeing An Accused Person Punished: Supreme Court May 3, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It has to be remarked right at the outset that in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Sadayappan @ Ganesan Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police in Criminal Appeal No. 1990 of 2012 delivered on April 26, 2019 has explicitly, elegantly and eruditely ruled while rejecting a defence contention in a criminal appeal […] Read more » Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar Justice NV Ramana for himself Sadayappan @ Ganesan Vs. State Witness Can Be Called Interested
Legal Articles Legal India Supreme Court sets aside merger order of NSEL with 63 moons technologies limited . May 3, 2019 / November 16, 2023 by Bharat Bhushan | Leave a Comment Judgment dated 30.04.2019 passed by the Hon. Supreme Court in 63 moons technologies limited (formerly, FTIL) Vs Union of India & Others Vide a detailed judgment dated 30.04.2019, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India was pleased to hold that the Order dated 12.02.2016 of forced amalgamation passed by the Central Government, was ultra vires of […] Read more » 63 moons technologies limited merger order of NSEL with 63 moons technologies limited . Supreme Court Supreme Court sets aside merger order of NSEL with 63 moons technologies limited .
Legal Articles Mere Abuse In A Filthy Language Does Not Attract Offence Of Criminal Intimidation U/s 506 IPC: SC April 29, 2019 / April 29, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment First and foremost, it must be said that the Supreme Court just recently on April 26, 2019 has in a notable judgment titled Vikram Johar v The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr in Criminal Appeal No. 759 of 2019 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4820/2017) has sought to send a loud […] Read more » Criminal Intimidation U/s 506 IPC
Legal Articles Even God Cannot Shake My Faith In CJI Ranjan Gogoi April 29, 2019 / April 29, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment Even if God himself appears before me and says anything against this incumbent CJI Ranjan Gogoi, I will say pointblank that, “You are God and can never speak lies. But I consider this CJI Ranjan Gogoi as one who can never do anything wrong. If you say anything against me I will immediately […] Read more » CJI Ranjan Gogoi
Legal Articles State Can Impose Restrictions To Consider Remission Claims: Supreme Court April 25, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It must be remarked right at the start that the Supreme Court most recently on April 22, 2019 in a landmark and laudable judgment titled State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma in Civil Appeal No(s). 3086 of 2016 along with others has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan […] Read more » Remission Claims Restriction on powers of remission and commutation Restrictions To Consider Remission State Can Impose Restrictions State Can Impose Restrictions To Consider Remission Claims
Legal Articles Supreme Court Slaps Fine Of Rs 20 Lakh On West Bengal Government For Blocking Release Of Film And Condemned Growing Intolerance To Dissent And Curbing Of Artistic Freedom April 18, 2019 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment In a major and significant development with far reaching consequences, the Supreme Court on April 11, 2019 has in a latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment titled Indibility Creative Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Got of West Bengal & Ors in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 306 of 2019 has minced no words to express its […] Read more » Artistic Freedom Dissent And Curbing Of Artistic Freedom Fine Of Rs 20 Lakh On West Bengal Government Growing Intolerance To Dissent And Curbing Of Artistic Freedom
Legal Articles Socio – Economic Factors Conditioning Indian Democracy – Problems and challenges April 16, 2019 by Akshita Sodhi | Leave a Comment Article written by Jagriti thakur and Keshav raj INTRODUCTION– Democracy is the most popular form of government of the day and major portion of the world is under its spell. The countries who do not have democracy are struggling to achieve it. But it had various forms and in each country its form is different […] Read more » chellenges of Indian Democracy Indian democracy problems of Indian Democracy
Legal Articles Sex After Obtaining Consent By False Promise To Marry Is Rape: Supreme Court. April 15, 2019 / November 16, 2023 by Sanjeev Sirohi | Leave a Comment It is significant to note that the Supreme Court most recently on April 9, 2019 has very strongly and sternly reiterated in a latest, landmark and laudable judgment titled Anurag Soni v. State of Chhattisgarh in Criminal Appeal No. 629 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP(Criminal) No. 618/2019) has reiterated in no uncertain terms […] Read more » High Court of Chhattisgarh Justice L Nageswara Rao Justice MR Shah SC Sex After Obtaining Consent By False Promise To Marry Is Rape Supreme Court