High Court Kerala High Court

Balan Nair vs State Of Kerala on 2 July, 2007

Kerala High Court
Balan Nair vs State Of Kerala on 2 July, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 645 of 1999()



1. BALAN NAIR
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SARVOTHAMAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.R.UDAYABHANU

 Dated :02/07/2007

 O R D E R
                       K.R.UDAYABHANU, J
                  ---------------------------------------------
                        Crl.R.P.No.645 of 1999
                   ---------------------------------------------
                Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2007

                                O R D E R

The revision petitioners stand convicted for the offence

under Sections 341, 447, 448 and 325 read with Section 34 IPC

and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of one month each

for the offences under Sections 325, 341, 447 and 448 read with

34 IPC and also to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each for the offence

under Section 325 IPC. The sentences of imprisonment shall run

concurrently.

2. The prosecution version is that the accused 1, 2 and 3

(A3 is absconding) on 15.2.1995 at about 9.00 p.m., trespassed

into the residential compound of the defacto complainant and

caused grievous hurt to her by attacking with a stick resulting in

fracture to the right forearm.

3. The evidence adduced in the matter consisted the

testimony of PWs’ 1 to 9 and Exts. P1 to P5. Although, charge

sheeted for the offence under Section 326 read with Section 34

IPC, as the weapon was not identified the accused were

convicted for the lesser offence under Section 325 IPC.

4. The counsel for the revision petitioner has only

CRRP645/99 Page numbers

pleaded for leniency pointing out that the incident has taken

place in February 1995 and A1/first revision petitioner is right

now 67 years of age and is suffering from various ailments.

5. Considering the evidence adduced in the matter and

the concurrent findings of the courts below, I find that the

conviction is only to be confirmed; and I do so. In the

circumstances pointed out by the counsel for the revision

petitioner, the sentence imposed for the offence under Section

325 IPC read with Section 34 is modified to imprisonment till the

rising of the court and to pay a compensation of Rs.10,000/- by

each of the accused to PW1 and in default, to undergo simple

imprisonment for six months each. It is submitted that a sum of

Rs.5,000/- each, the fine amount, has been deposited before the

court below. If so, the revision petitioner will be liable to deposit

the balance Rs.5,000/- each. The fine amount deposited shall be

treated as compensation. The revision petitioners/A1 and A2

shall appear before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III,

Thrissur on 16.8.2007 to receive the sentence.

The criminal revision petition is disposed of accordingly.

K.R.UDAYABHANU,
JUDGE
csl