High Court Kerala High Court

Kurian Abraham vs K.C.Kuruvila on 2 July, 2007

Kerala High Court
Kurian Abraham vs K.C.Kuruvila on 2 July, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 2125 of 2007()


1. KURIAN ABRAHAM, AGED 59 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. K.C.KURUVILA, AGED 56 YEARS,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.G.ADITYA SHENOY

                For Respondent  :SRI.V.ARUN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :02/07/2007

 O R D E R
                                      R.BASANT, J

                           ------------------------------------

                             Crl.M.C.No.2125 of 2007

                           -------------------------------------

                        Dated this the 2nd day of July, 2007


                                        O R D E R

The petitioner has been found guilty, convicted and sentenced in

a prosecution under Section 138 of the N.I Act. The verdict of guilty,

conviction and sentence have now become final with the disposal of

the criminal revision petition by another Bench of this Court as per

order dated 11.01.2005. The petitioner faces a sentence of

imprisonment for a period of one month. There is also a direction to

pay an amount of Rs.1,03,375/- as compensation. In default of

payment of the compensation amount, there is a direction to undergo

S.I for a further period of one month.

2. The petitioner has now been committed to prison to

undergo the substantive sentence of imprisonment for one month.

3. At this stage, the petitioner and the complainant have

come together before this Court with a petition under Section 147 of

the N.I Act. In that petition, it is reported to the Court that the

parties have settled their disputes and the complainant has

compounded the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner herein.

The application for composition is duly signed by the rival contestants

and counter signed by their respective counsel. The learned counsel

for the 1st respondent/complainant Advocate Arun Viswanathan

Crl.M.C.No.2125 of 2007 2

confirms to this Court that the matter has been settled between the

parties. He vouches for the signature of the complainant in the

application for composition.

4. Both the counsel submit that the matter has been settled.

I am satisfied from the submissions made at the Bar, from the

averments in this Crl.M.C and the joint statement filed by the rival

contestants duly counter signed by their counsel as also the

submissions made by the learned counsel for the 1st respondent that

the parties have willingly and voluntarily settled their disputes and

the complainant has compounded the offence under Section 138 of

the N.I Act committed by the petitioner. The liability to pay the entire

amount of compensation due has also been discharged, it is

submitted.

5. The revision petition having already been disposed of, the

learned counsel for the accused/petitioner and the 1st

respondent/complainant place reliance on the dictum in Sabu George

v. Home Secretary [2007(1) KLT 982] to contend that the

composition may be accepted and the unjust consequence of the

accused being compelled to undergo incarceration in prison for a

period of one month in execution of the sentence even after

composition of the offence may be avoided. The counsel inform the

Court that the entire composition amount has been paid and

discharged. The counsel further submit that the accused has been

Crl.M.C.No.2125 of 2007 3

undergoing imprisonment in execution of the substantive sentence of

imprisonment for the past 4 days.

6. I am satisfied that notwithstanding the disposal of the

criminal revision petition, this is an eminently fit case where the

powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C can and ought to be invoked as

permitted in Sabu George v. Home Secretary to avoid the unjust

consequence of the petitioner being forced to undergo substantive

sentence of imprisonment for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I

Act.

7. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, allowed. The

verdict of guilty, conviction and sentence of the petitioner in the

prosecution under Section 138 of the N.I Act which has become final

with the order dated 11.1.2005 in Crl.R.P.No.3391 of 2004 is hereby

set aside. The petitioner, if he is in prison, shall be released from

custody forthwith.

8. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel for

the petitioner today itself.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/-

Crl.M.C.No.2125 of 2007 4