High Court Karnataka High Court

Mohammed Munna @ Munna vs S.N.Kenchappa @ Kenchegowda on 31 May, 2011

Karnataka High Court
Mohammed Munna @ Munna vs S.N.Kenchappa @ Kenchegowda on 31 May, 2011
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala
 ; v..gB;;~:;;}4§'s%: N Sriréévagag §@¥(z; '£3? 9&2';
 >._(§"<=«3.~%s serveéjé

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED was THE 313*" DAY <3? MAY 2011 J VT

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K. B_HAK'rHAv;égifsAiLA  u  M'

M£SCELLANE{'3LfS HRST APPEAL No':543'_7;20§9    

BETWEEN

Mehammed Murma @ Mama, 
S/0 Mohammad Khaiender;
Age: 43 years,

R/at 4*' Cross, Marafur Dime
Extension;   .  _  .  =

Tumkur.       A '  Appetiant

{By Sr? C V  for
appestant)  ....  %  "  ., 'V V * "  

AND
1. S N KenchappaL@%%Keh'chégo-mi
S/0 Mczhammed Khé{~en'deVr;V-_ '
Age: 40 yeaérfsé." L.  _ V
     ..... 

R/a’t_An’ep.a_Eya; ‘ _ ”

Barakana*aiu~Pc.s£:;% AV ‘ _
Ch§kka%:ay«a[kana%s«3»i§% .T’cZ%§”i.!!<,,
"%T;;.mkur I3isfri<:t, 1'

'C555;

_ Ufiaiieé india ‘insurance Co’ Ltd.;
‘E\£.Q.”83..,T Raggmendra Ceicmy,
=:I;r*pa, {§x:wt”‘:€’gEr§s High Schaot
=.j-~._B=H”??,Q’a.,d;-Ti§i:L:r~572 291.
i»f~1:s§:§;–«i::y its Branch F«’1an3§e%”, Reggmzdenis

;.V»CensidAe-2flVa§:«lleelA structure ef a driver in the year 2605,
l”Vvi_a’ceme Q? the g:§aE;9e1aAet can be safely fixed at 34,508!» per month;
‘ ‘W.-§ierea’sAAthe “l;°:*.§V%c:§luna¥ has fixed at ?3,G€}O,i– per mcmth. le my view,

V ‘e¥[a’ilfe’a.efA’&.-ée eetitlee far cemeensatlen as weer:

in

bcrdy. The Tribunal has awarded cempensatlen in fame? of the

claimant as under:

(in 3)…- , ~.

{E} Pain and Suffering 20,GQ_€Zf__~O{}-« ” »

{ii} Medical expenses «

(Eli) Loss effuture earning
(€3,009/~x10%xl2x14) ‘50,4*fl,O–€}_U, ” ”

(iv) Attendant charges

(V) Travelling expenses 2,00.Q-Q5)

5. Keeping ln_ fracture of left
clavicle and l:he_ at the time of accident
and he was a claimant required atleasi: 3
months’ time Pest. Therefore, the claimant ls

eretltled for :;orrzc,;eensa”cl.c;_Vri towards loss of earning for a period of 3

mcieghlllsi; l T’l”xeilfilajllrncant iemlla resident: of Tumkur. Taking into

E

l

eée;:pe§’£,aVnt;cIeeu5s315a:)t.’ ‘is emitted for edditienai compensation ef
%?§},’1’€3{}£$ Ei§Qf1g ‘;N§t¥’1 cests ans interest: at the rate of 6% per annum
V “v.f:’z;;m-.§%”:e’–£jet’e ef Petiiien ‘gift reaiisatieng Aecereiingiyg the imeugneef

~V..j_:;T§g:éf%e3§:§:T eeé award age meéifieds

(in 2*)
{i} F*ein and suffering 3G,OG€3~OQ >T
{ii} Medicai expenses 15,GOG§:Z§§ “” ‘V’

(iii) Loss of earning during the »
peréed 01′ treatment and rest ‘_ .y _ ‘ V ~ .
{€4,500/-X3} ”

{Ev} Attendant! speciai diet,
conveyance and incfidentaé
expenses 10;GQQ–00 fg
(V) Loss of future earni:§g._”‘:A«. _ V
($4,500/~x10%x12x14)

(vi) Loss 0fameVn.§.§§’e.g;’ _: ~:,é;*oo0»oo
V%1′;e4,1o0-00
Less; -e§’v;.teid”ed…by

the’i’:<1fh_unz;%:,l4 . 85,400-O0

'Additionei'~§e.nd'p.s§h»s,:3.£ion

Thus, the ap§3'e'!tanticia"'imeht is: entitied for additionai cempensation

of %';.e,i'o<e;'§;

6. §ne.t§’*.e’e Appeal is partiy aiiowedg heiding that the

E
:,\,%/,/w

Respondent No.2/insurance Company is directed to depesit
the additional Compensation atong with casts and interest wVi–E’:*z’the

Tribunafi, within two months from tociay.

?’8js _ ..

-‘
: €
/»:

.