Prakash vs Punam on 27 April, 2010

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CRA/1250/2000	 2/ 2	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
REVISION APPLICATION No. 1250 of 2000
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
 
 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================


 

PRAKASH
@ BALU DHARAMDAS BASANTANI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

PUNAM
D/O GOVINDRAM JAMNADAS - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
BK OZA for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR GJ ASRANI for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

Date
: 27/04/2010 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT

1. Shri
B.K. Oza, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant has
submitted that as the main H.R.P. Suit itself is decided and disposed
of against which even appeal is also preferred, the present Civil
Revision Application has become infructuous.

2. Under
the circumstances, the present Civil Revision Application is
dismissed as having become infructuous. Rule is discharged.
Ad-interim relief granted earlier, if any, stands vacated. No costs.

(M.R.

SHAH, J.)

siji

Top